The Relationship between Facial Width-to-Height Ratio and Psychological Characteristics, Social Behavior, and Social Perception
S. A. Saribay
Abstract:Recent research shows that human facial morphology plays an important role in the impressions that perceivers form about target individuals (Todorov, Olivola, Dotsch, & Mende-Siedlecki, 2015). Whether impressions accurately capture targets’ psychological characteristics is a matter of debate. If certain biological factors underlie or influence both facial features and behavioral tendencies, perceivers could in principle make accurate inferences about targets. The facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR; i.e., bizygomatic distance divided by the distance between upper lip and middle of the eyebrows) has recently received increasing research attention due to the possibility that it serves as an honest signal in this sense. This paper reviews the empirical literature on the relationship between fWHR and psychological characteristics and social-behavioral tendencies of face-bearers, as well as the role fWHR plays in perceivers’ impressions of face-bearers. Initial theorizing and evidence pointed to the possibility that fWHR tracks face-bearers’ testosterone levels (Lefevre, Lewis, Perrett, & Penke, 2013; Weston, Friday, & Liò, 2007). However, subsequent research produced evidence that failed to support this possibility (e.g., Bird et al., 2016). Because testosterone is more influential in male development (Nelson, 2011), fWHR was assumed to be sexually dimorphic, that is, greater in males compared to females. Evidence on this matter is also inconsistent, with some studies supporting dimorphism (e.g., Weston et al., 2007) and others not (e.g., Özener, 2012). Thus, further research is needed to settle the debate regarding fWHR’s link to testosterone and whether it is a sexually dimorphic feature of the human face. Due to the above-mentioned assumption of its link to testosterone, fWHR has been studied mostly in male targets and mostly in terms of its relation to behavioral tendencies such as aggression, dominance, and deceitfulness. fWHR appears to be related positively to aggressiveness in both lab-based measures and real-world settings (e.g., in hockey and soccer players) (e.g., Carré & McCormick, 2008). It is possible that such findings, as well as others involving the fWHR, could be explained away by body mass index (BMI), which tends to be positively correlated with fWHR (Deaner, Goetz, Shattuck, & Schnotala, 2012). Furthermore, recent research indicates that it may be only low status males for whom this relationship between fWHR and aggressiveness holds (Goetz et al., 2013). Regardless, two meta-analyses support a small but reliable fWHR-aggressiveness link (Geniole, Denson, Dixson, Carré, & McCormick, 2015; Haselhuhn, Ormiston, & Wong, 2015). Likewise, fWHR was found to be related positively to dominance and the drive for success (e.g., to real-world financial performance of CEOs) in some studies (Lewis, Lefevre, & Bates, 2012; Wong, Ormiston, & Haselhuhn, 2011). Finally, fWHR is positively related to the tendency to deceive partners in economic games (Haselhuhn & Wong, 2012; Stirrat & Perrett, 2010) and to unethical behavior more generally (Geniole, Keyes, Carré, & McCormick, 2014), which in turn may be driven by the need for dominance. In fact, fWHR is positively related to the tendency to cooperate with ingroup members when it serves to dominate an outgroup (Stirrat & Perrett, 2012). Apart from these more commonly researched characteristics, fWHR has also been found to be related positively to explicit (but not implicit) prejudice (Hehman, Leitner, Deegan, & Gaertner, 2013) and there is mixed evidence in terms of its relation to reproductive success (Gómez-Valdés et al., 2013; Loehr & O’Hara, 2013). Turning to social perception, fWHR is also related to perceivers’ impressions of face-bearers in directions that parallel the findings above. For instance, fWHR is positively related to aggressiveness perceptions (Marsh, Cardinale, Chentsova-Dutton, Grossman, & Krumpos, 2014; Short et al., 2012). Evidence indicates that it is
Psychology