Abstract:Background: In 1982, the Annals of Virology published a paper showing how Liberia has a highly endemic potential of Ebola warning health authorities of the risk for potential outbreaks; this journal is only available by subscription. Limiting the accessibility of such knowledge may have reduced information propagation toward public health actors who were indeed surprised by and unprepared for the 2014 epidemic. Open access (OA) publication can allow for increased access to global health research (GHR). Our study aims to assess the use, cost and impact of OA diffusion in the context of GHR. Method: A total of 3366 research articles indexed under the Medical Heading Subject Heading "Global Health" published between 2010 and 2014 were retrieved using PubMed to (1) quantify the uptake of various types of OA, (2) estimate the article processing charges (APCs) of OA, and (3) analyse the relationship between different types of OA, their scholarly impact and gross national income per capita of citing countries. Results: Most GHR publications are not available directly on the journal's website (69%). Further, 60.8% of researchers do not self-archive their work even when it is free and in keeping with journal policy. The total amount paid for APCs was estimated at US$1.7 million for 627 papers, with authors paying on average US$2732 per publication; 94% of APCs were paid to journals owned by the ten most prominent publication houses from high-income countries. Researchers from low- and middle-income countries are generally citing less expensive types of OA, while researchers in high-income countries are citing the most expensive OA. Conclusions: Although OA may help in building global research capacity in GHR, the majority of publications remain subscription only. It is logical and cost-efficient for institutions and researchers to promote OA by self-archiving publications of restricted access, as it not only allows research to be cited by a broader audience, it also augments citation rates. Although OA does not ensure full knowledge transfer from research to practice, limiting public access can negatively impact implementation and outcomes of health policy and reduce public understanding of health issues.

Innovation in the public sphere:* reimagining law and economics to solve the National Institutes of Health publishing controversy

Investing in Open Science: Key Considerations for Funders

Want a better h-index? - All you need to know about copyright and open access

Innovation Economics Approach to Intellectual Property Law Scholarship

Order Without Intellectual Property Law: Open Science in Influenza

How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research

Promoting 'Academic Entrepreneurship' in Europe and the United States: Creating an Intellectual Property Regime to Facilitate the Efficient Transfer of Knowledge from the Lab to the Patient

Can scientists and their institutions become their own open access publishers?

The academic ethics of open access to research and scholarship

Knowledge sharing in global health research - the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature

The rent's too high: Self-archive for fair online publication costs

Publish, Don’t Perish: Recommendations for Mitigating Impacts of the New Federal Open Access Policy

Academic Medical Centers as Innovation Ecosystems: Evolution of Industry Partnership Models Beyond the Bayh-Dole Act

Pandemic-Resilient Investment: Sustainable Knowledge Infrastructure for Medical AI

Essays on the Economics of Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights

Open Code-Open Content Open Law. Building a Digital Commons

A Market Shaping Approach for the Biopharmaceutical Industry: Governing Innovation Towards the Public Interest

Intellectual Property Rights and Access in Crisis

The structural transformation of the scientific public sphere: Constitution and consequences of the path towards open access

Evaluating the impact of open access policies on research institutions

Open Science and the impact of Open Access, Open Data, and FAIR publishing principles on data-driven academic research: Towards ever more transparent, accessible, and reproducible academic output?