Abstract:Objective: The first wave of the coronavirus SARS-COV-2 pandemic has revealed a fragmented governance within the European Union (EU) to tackle public health emergencies. This qualitative study aims: 1) to understand the current EU position within the field of public health emergencies taking the case of the COVID-19 as an example by comparing and contrasting experiences from EU institutions and experts from various EU Member States at the beginning of the pandemic; and, 2) to identify and to formulate future EU pandemic strategies and actions based on experts' opinions. Methods: Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with public health experts from various European Member States and European Commission officials from May 2020 until August 2020. The transcripts were analyzed by Thematic Content Analysis (TCA), mainly a manifest content analysis. Results: This study demonstrated that the limited EU mandate in health hinders proper actions to prevent and tackle infectious disease outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The results showed that this limitation significantly impacted the ECDC, as the Member States' competence did not allow the agency to have more capacity. The European Commission has fulfilled its role of coordinating and supporting the Member States by facilitating networks and information exchange. However, EU intra- and inter-communication need further improvement. Although diverse EU instruments and mechanisms were found valid, their implementation needed to be faster and more efficient. The results pointed out that underlying political challenges in EU decision-making regarding health emergencies hinder the aligned response. It was stated that the Member States were not prepared, and due to the restriction of their mandate, EU institutions could not enforce binding guidelines. Additionally, the study explored future EU pandemic strategies and actions. Both, EU institutions and national experts suggested similar and clear recommendations regarding the ECDC, the investment, and future harmonized preparedness tools. Conclusion: The complex politics of public health at the EU level have led to the fragmentation of its governance for effective pandemic responses. This ongoing pandemic has shed light on the fragility of the political and structural systems in Europe in public health emergencies. Health should be of high importance in the political agenda, and robust health reforms at the local, regional, national, and EU levels are highly recommended.

The Limited Role of the European Union in the Management and Governance of the COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19, The Rule of Law and Democracy. Analysis of Legal Responses to a Global Health Crisis

The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for Future Emergencies

COVID‐19 and Global Governance

Has Global Health Law Risen to Meet the COVID-19 Challenge? Revisiting the International Health Regulations to Prepare for Future Threats

Legal scenarios in the coronavirus time: Medico legal implications in the aspects of governance

The architecture of the European Union’s pandemic preparedness and response policy framework

Pandemic bordering: domestic politicisation, European coordination, and national border closures in the COVID-19 crisis

The Pandemic Paradox in International Law

Emergency Powers in Response to COVID-19: Policy Diffusion, Democracy, and Preparedness

The strength of a weak centre: pandemic politics in the European Union and the United States

The European Health Union and the protection of public health in the European Union: Is the European Union prepared for future cross-border health threats?

EU health policy in the aftermath of COVID-19: neofunctionalism and crisis-driven integration

Failing forward? Crises and patterns of European integration

Governmentality Versus Community: The Impact of the COVID Lockdowns

Global Governance After the COVID-19 Crisis

Quantifying Policy Responses to a Global Emergency: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Responding to COVID-19: an exploration of EU country responses and directions for further research

EU Responses to the Democratic Deficit and the Rule of Law Crisis: Is It Time for a (New) European Exceptionalism?

The Intersection of Law and Public Health: Legal Responses to Pandemics

Government capacity, societal trust or party preferences: what accounts for the variety of national policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe?