Abstract:AlphaFold2 (AF2) and RoseTTaFold (RF) have revolutionized structural biology, serving as highly reliable and effective methods for predicting protein structures. This article explores their impact and limitations, focusing on their integration into experimental pipelines and their application in diverse protein classes, including membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and oligomers. In experimental pipelines, AF2 models help X-ray crystallography in resolving the phase problem, while complementarity with mass spectrometry and NMR data enhances structure determination and protein flexibility prediction. Predicting the structure of membrane proteins remains challenging for both AF2 and RF due to difficulties in capturing conformational ensembles and interactions with the membrane. Improvements in incorporating membrane-specific features and predicting the structural effect of mutations are crucial. For intrinsically disordered proteins, AF2's confidence score (pLDDT) serves as a competitive disorder predictor, but integrative approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations or hydrophobic cluster analyses are advocated for accurate dynamics representation. AF2 and RF show promising results for oligomeric models, outperforming traditional docking methods, with AlphaFold-Multimer showing improved performance. However, some caveats remain in particular for membrane proteins. Real-life examples demonstrate AF2's predictive capabilities in unknown protein structures, but models should be evaluated for their agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, AF2 models can be used complementarily with MD simulations. In this Perspective, we propose a "wish list" for improving deep-learning-based protein folding prediction models, including using experimental data as constraints and modifying models with binding partners or post-translational modifications. Additionally, a meta-tool for ranking and suggesting composite models is suggested, driving future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

Prediction of the Iron–Sulfur Binding Sites in Proteins Using the Highly Accurate Three-Dimensional Models Calculated by AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold

Predicting the Structure of Enzymes with Metal Cofactors:The Example of [FeFe] Hydrogenases

Predicting metal-protein interactions using cofolding methods: Status quo

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

How accurately can one predict drug binding modes using AlphaFold models?

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

Protein structure prediction in the era of AI: Challenges and limitations when applying to in silico force spectroscopy

Prediction of Protein Function from Tertiary Structure of the Active Site in Heme Proteins by Convolutional Neural Network

Efficient and accurate prediction of protein structure using RoseTTAFold2

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

Challenges in predicting PROTAC-mediated Protein-Protein Interfaces with AlphaFold

Do Deep Learning Models for Co-Folding Learn the Physics of Protein-Ligand Interactions?

State-of-the-Art Estimation of Protein Model Accuracy using AlphaFold

Protein Design Using Structure-Prediction Networks: AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold as Protein Structure Foundation Models

Accurate Prediction of Enzyme Thermostabilization with Rosetta Using AlphaFold Ensembles

Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3

AI told you so: navigating protein structure prediction in the era of machine learning

Comprehensive Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer, AlphaFold3 and ColabFold, and Scoring Functions in Predicting Protein-Peptide Complex Structures

Prediction of protein structure and AI

Conservation of Hot Spots and Ligand Binding Sites in Protein Models by AlphaFold2

Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome