The capital asset pricing model in economic perspective

Peter C. Dawson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.975333

IF: 1.916

2014-11-14

Applied Economics

Abstract:The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is theoretically incomplete in its demand-side focus, risk-averse investors and internally inconsistent homogeneous beliefs; is not conclusively supported empirically; and yet it legitimizes a notion that investors can earn higher returns by bearing undiversifiable risk. Our article does not merely extend the CAPM with more realistic assumptions, it completes its original framework by including (1) risk-taking investors in the investor population, (2) investors who can have heterogeneous expectations or beliefs – an overlooked but required condition for the CAPM to be an internally consistent and meaningful model of competitive financial asset pricing under uncertainty and (3) a positive-sloped short-run supply curve based on a reasonable interpretation of the nature of financial asset trade. Upon a complete economic interpretation, it is shown that the equilibrium (systematic) risk-rate of return relationship depends on whose aggregate trading activity dominates, risk-averse or risk-taking investors’. There is no universal, or even general, positive relationship between systematic risk and rate of return. This has far-reaching implications for investors and investment advisors who serve them.

economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are the theoretical incompleteness of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the lack of empirical support. Specifically, the author Peter C. Dawson points out:

1. **Theoretical Incompleteness**:
- CAPM mainly focuses on the demand side, assuming that investors are all risk - averse and have homogeneous beliefs, which leads to consistency problems within the model.
- The model does not consider the situation of risk - loving investors in the market, nor does it consider that investors may hold heterogeneous expectations or beliefs.

2. **Lack of Empirical Support**:
- Although CAPM theoretically proposes a positive relationship between systematic risk and expected return, this conclusion has not been fully empirically supported.
- Existing empirical research has not consistently verified the core assumptions of CAPM.

3. **Limitations of the Model**:
- CAPM assumes that all investors are rational, risk - averse, and have the same understanding and expectations of market information, and these assumptions do not hold in reality.
- The model ignores speculative behavior in the market and the influence of risk - loving investors.

To solve these problems, the author proposes a more comprehensive framework, including the following points:

1. **Introducing Risk - Loving Investors**:
- Add risk - loving investors to the investor group, and their trading activities may dominate the market in some cases.

2. **Considering Heterogeneous Expectations or Beliefs**:
- Allow investors to have different interpretations and expectations of the same information, which is a neglected but necessary condition in the CAPM model.

3. **Introducing a Short - Term Supply Curve with a Positive Slope**:
- Based on a reasonable explanation of the nature of financial market trading, introduce a short - term supply curve with a positive slope.

Through these improvements, the author believes that in a competitive financial asset market, the relationship between systematic risk and return is not always a stable or predictable positive relationship. When the overall trading activities of risk - loving investors dominate the market, a negative relationship between systematic risk and return may occur. This conclusion has far - reaching implications for investors and investment advisors and challenges the traditional risk - return paradigm.