Abstract:Industrial cluster policies have been put into practice in many countries around the world, including in Asia. Our previous studies, such as Kuchiki (2005) and Kuchiki and Tsuji (2005, 2008) postulated a hypothesis regarding the formation of industrial clusters which is referred to as the ‘Flowchart Approach’. This approach explains the formation in such a way that anchor firms establish production bases first; followed by supporting firms establishing facilities near them, which constitutes the core of the industrial cluster at the initial stage, and then in accordance with clustering, more firms agglomerate in those regions and accordingly more information related to transactions, technologies, know-how, etc. are exchanged. This process leads economic activities of industrial clusters to increase more and more, and they come to play important roles such as the economic development of regions as well as a national economy. The Flowchart Approach is thus based on the success of Industrial Parks, Special Economic Zones, or Special Export Zones in East Asia such as Taiwan, Korea and China. The Development of their electronics and automotive industries are good examples. The Flowchart Approach emphasizes factors which attract firms to particular regions, including: (1) domestic demand and natural resources such as raw materials and human resources; (2) physical infrastructure including highways, roads, airports, electricity, water supplies; (3) social infrastructure such as legal, financial and intellectual property rights systems, and the degree of deregulation; and (4) incentive schemes for investment provided by governments. The Flowchart Approach as a principle of constructing policy measures involves setting a proper target, prioritizing the policy measures, and finding actors to implement the policy measures. Let us discuss the difference between the Flowchart Approach and other theories in order to clarify the former. First, Komiya et al. (1988) define the industrial policy as a policy under which the central government intervenes in the existence of market failures due to dynamic inefficiency by

MALAYSIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, LEADING INDUSTRIES AND INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERS

Malaysia: Industrial success and the role of the government

Innovation and Productivity in the Malaysian Food Processing Industry: An Empirical Analysis using a System Generalised Method of Moments Approach

SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES AND ECONOMIC GROWTH:\r\nEVIDENCE FROM PAKISTAN

Leading sector and dual economy: how Indonesia and Malaysia mobilised Chinese capital in mineral processing

Economics of catching up and leapfrogging: how have Malaysia and Thailand fared against South Korea and Taiwan in the electronics industry?

The political economy of moving up in global value chains: how Malaysia added value to its natural resources through industrial policy

2 The Automobile Industry Cluster in Malaysia

The political economy of foreign investment and industrial development: the Philippines, Malaysia and Thailand in comparative perspective

Structure and agency in the Malaysian government’s policies for economic development

The Development and Future Direction of Malaysia’s Livestock Industry

Determinants of Export Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in Malaysia

IMPACT OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, IMPORTS AND TARIFF DEREGULATION ON EXPORTS AMONG PIONEERING ASEAN MEMBERS: PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

2018 WTO Trade Policy Review of Malaysia

Developing the Space Industry of Malaysia: The Policy Frameworks

Malaysia – Trade Policy Review 2006

Revealed Comparative Advantage of Malaysian Exports: The Case for Changing Export Composition

The Scenario of Textile Industry in Malaysia: A Review for Potentiality

Indonesia’s Industrial Diplomacy: Prospects and Challenges

Leveraging the Industrial Collaboration Program for Malaysia's Aerospace Industry

Digital Marketing Perspective in Cattle Business: Supply Chain Integrated Approach