Abstract:When President Obama visited Australia in November 2011, he was very direct concerning the future American role in the Asia-Pacific region: "As President, therefore, I have made a deliberate and strategic decision--as a Pacific nation, the United States will play a larger and long-term role in shaping this region and its future, by upholding core principles and in close partnership with our allies and friends." (1) The Asia-Pacific region currently forms the epicenter of world affairs and incorporates the majority of great powers (emerging and confirmed), most nuclear powers, and more than one-third of the world's population. Although the region is the new global economic driving force, security challenges remain (piracy, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, natural resources, border issues, etc.). Economic interdependence has not negated the risk of conflict; tensions remain with regard to the Korean peninsula, Taiwan, and the maritime border disputes in the South China Sea. As General Martin E. Dempsey summed it, "All of the trends, demographic trends, geopolitical trends, economic trends and military trends are shifting toward the Pacific. So our strategic challenges in the future will largely emanate out of the Pacific region, but also the littorals of the Indian Ocean." (2) In the current context of transitioning the balance of power toward Asia, the zone extending from the Gulf of Bengal to the Sea of Japan has become even more of a vital interest for Washington. Although the United States still dominates in the Pacific, it is less so than in the past, a reflection of Asia undergoing profound change. As mentioned in the Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense document, the United States has reached an "inflection point," (3) and although the words "relative decline" or "overstretch" are not pronounced, the "unipolar moment," as defined by the syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer, is ending. With that thought as a discerning factor, the United States has established new priorities and reinforced its diplomatic and military presence in an attempt to ensure Pax Americana in the Pacific. In November 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote an article in Foreign Policy, entitled "America's Pacific Century." The article was precise and left no doubt regarding the United States' intentions and objectives. Clinton established six priorities: * Reinforce bilateral alliances. * Deepen relations with emerging powers (China among others). * Reengage with multilateral regional institutions. * Expand commerce and investments. * Forge a large military presence. * Advance democracy and human rights. (4) Although the relationship with China is addressed at length in the article, two countries receive particular attention--India and Indonesia. In the document Sustaining US Global Leadership. Priorities for 21st Century Defense, published in January 2012, US leaders confirm these policies: US economic and security interests are inextricably linked to developments in the arc extending from the Western Pacific and East Asia into the Indian Ocean region and South Asia, creating a mix of evolving challenges and opportunities. Accordingly, while the US military will continue to contribute to security globally, we will of necessity rebalance toward the Asia-Pacific region. (5) The document also directs the protection of the "global commons, those areas beyond national jurisdiction that constitute the vital connective tissue of the international system." (6) To these ends, on a military level, the traditional alliances with Japan, South Korea, Australia, the Philippines, and Thailand had served as the bedrock for this policy, but the updated version goes beyond these core partners; new relationships and capacities are outlined for development. In the wake of this adaptation and adjustment of the security architecture, one nation in particular receives special attention--China. …

The United States and Japan in East Asia: Challenges and Prospects for the Alliance

Recasting U.S.-Japan Ties in a New Era of Economic Security

Japan—US—South Korea Triangle: How Strong Will the New Alliance Be?

Asia Pacific regional security: balance of power or concert of powers?

Taiwan In Japan'S Relations With China And The United States After The Cold War

America and China in the Asia-Pacific: A new regional Cold War?

Bolstering the Alliance for a Trilateralism‐Based Security Strategy for South Korea in Times of US–China Rivalry*

Sino-Japanese Relatious:A Power Transition Theory Perspective

U.S.-Japan Economic Cooperation Under the Biden Administration

A Study on the Conflict between East Asia, China and Taiwan and the Cooperation between South Korea, the U.S. and Japan

The Reassertion of the United States in the Asia-Pacific Region

Alliance of the USA, Japan, Philippines: A New Format to Contain China?

Japan, South Korea and the rise of a networked security architecture in East Asia

Strengthening crisis management, the most urgent task in current China–US and China–Japan security relations

China-Japan cooperation rests on shaky foundations

Changing Roles: China and the United States in East Asian Security

From management crisis to crisis management? Japan’s post-2012 institutional reforms and Sino-Japanese crisis (In)stability

United States Leadership in East Asia and China’s State-by-state Approach to Regional Security

China, the United States, and Prospects for Asian Space Cooperation

Hegemonic Cooperation and Conflict: Postwar Japan's China Policy and the United States

TIME-VARYING CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUTH KOREA-UNITED STATES AND JAPAN-UNITED STATES MILITARY ALLIANCES UNDER CHINESE THREAT: A PUBLIC GOOD APPROACH