The building financing fund: main problems of ensuring and protection of beneficiary’s rights and interests

D. Spiesivtsev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2308-5053.2021.1(49).233161

2021-06-08

Abstract:The active usage of investment and financing mechanisms in sphere of construction of housing determines the necessity of involving the financial means of individuals and legal entities to such process and comes with risks for investors. At the same time the negative experience associated with frauds in sphere of construction of housing that caused a damage to the persons who had invested in housing within the territory of Ukraine and the intentions of lawmaker to establish the juridical mechanisms of financing of the construction that would neutralize or minimalize appropriate dangers determines the necessity to researched such juridical schemes in context of ensuring and protection of rights and interests of the participants of appropriate relationships. The author determines the advantages and disadvantages of the model of financing of construction of housing through building financing funds. It is defined that the obvious advantages of such model are: the professionalism of trustee; the usage of such ensuring and protective means for beneficiary’s (investor’s) rights and interests as hypothec, insurance of the developer’s risk of break the terms of obligations execution. The ensuring character also has the process of fixation of an investment object for beneficiary. At the same time the author states that it is difficult to justify the “encumbrance” of basic investment model by abovementioned ensuring and protective components. Even within basic investment model the beneficiary’s (investor’s) rights and interests could be ensured by hypothec of proprietary interests rights. Moreover the beneficiary (investor) can use insurance. The main advantage of the mechanism of financing of the construction through the building financing fund is the beneficiaries (investors) possibility to acquire with less organizational costs of a right of property on unfinished building in case when developer breaks his obligations. But at the same time the mechanism of financing of the construction through the fund rises the price of investment objects because of additional expenses. It is defined that despite of the provision of part three of the article 4 of the Law of Ukraine On investment Activity such provision does not neutralize a possibility to use alternative juridical schemes of the investment and financing of housing.