Clinical significance of serum and urinary soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) in primary nephrotic syndrome and MPO-ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis in Japanese

Keiji Fujimoto,Junko Imura,Hirokatsu Atsumi,Yuki Matsui,Hiroki Adachi,Hiroshi Okuyama,Hideki Yamaya,Hitoshi Yokoyama

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-014-1067-x

IF: 2.6212

2014-12-13

Clinical and Experimental Nephrology

Abstract:BackgroundThe soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) has been implicated as a cause of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). However, the clinical significance of suPAR in glomerular diseases currently remains unclear.MethodsIn this retrospective single-center cohort study, we investigated serum (s-) and urinary (u-) suPAR in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome (NS) (serum/urine: 37/32 cases) and MPO-ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN) (serum/urine: 13/11 cases).ResultsIn pretreatment s- and u-suPAR, no significant differences were observed between the primary NS and ANCA-GN groups or among the pathological types of primary NS. An inverse correlation was noted between pretreatment s-suPAR and eGFR in the primary NS and ANCA-GN groups. A positive correlation was noted between pretreatment u-suPAR and proteinuria in the primary NS group. Furthermore, time-course changes in s- and u-suPAR over 2 months after therapy were associated with the therapeutic responsiveness of primary NS, particularly the differentiation of MCNS from FSGS (s-suPAR: AUC-ROC = 0.905, p = 0.007; u-suPAR: AUC-ROC = 0.816, p = 0.048). In the ANCA-GN group, a positive correlation was found between pretreatment s-suPAR and clinical severity or crescent formation, whereas u-suPAR was not correlated with these parameters.ConclusionS- and u-suPAR after therapy may serve as clinical markers to judge the treatment response of untreated NS and differentiate MCNS from FSGS, but not in pretreatment patients. S-, but not u-suPAR may predict the severity of and crescent formation in ANCA-GN.

urology & nephrology