The effects of rule changes in football-code team sports: a systematic review
Gordon Rennie Lucy Chesson Dan Weaving Ben Jones a Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre,Carnegie School of Sport,Leeds Beckett University,Leeds,UKb Catapult Sports,Melbourne,NSW,Australiac Applied Sports Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory,The University of Newcastle,Ourimbah,Australiad Department of Physical Activity and Sport,Faculty of Arts and Sciences,Edge Hill University,Ormskirk,UKe Division of Physiological Sciences and Health Through Physical Activity,Lifestyle and Sport Research Centre,Department of Human Biology,Faculty of Health Sciences,University of Cape Town,Cape Town,South Africaf School of Behavioural and Health Sciences,Faculty of Health Sciences,Australian Catholic University,Brisbane,QLD,Australiag England Performance Unit,Rugby Football League,Manchester,UKh Rugby Department,Premiership Rugby,London,UK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2024.2375752
2024-07-26
Science and Medicine in Football
Abstract:Rule changes within football-code team sports aim to improve performance, enhance player welfare, increase competitiveness, and provide player development opportunities. This manuscript aimed to review research investigating the effects of rule changes in football-code team sports. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus) was performed to August 2023; keywords related to rule changes, football-code team sports, and activity type. Studies were excluded if they failed to investigate a football-code team sport, did not quantify the change of rule, or were review articles. Forty-six studies met the eligibility criteria. Four different football codes were reported: Australian rules football ( n = 4), rugby league ( n = 6), rugby union ( n = 16), soccer ( n = 20). The most common category was physical performance and match-play characteristics ( n = 22). Evidence appears at a high risk of bias partly due to the quasi-experimental nature of included studies, which are inherently non-randomised, but also due to the lack of control for confounding factors within most studies included. Rule changes can result in unintended consequences to performance (e.g., longer breaks in play) and effect player behaviour (i.e., reduce tackler height in rugby) but might not achieve desired outcome (i.e., unchanged concussion incidence). Coaches and governing bodies should regularly and systematically investigate the effects of rule changes to understand their influence on performance and injury risk. It is imperative that future studies analysing rule changes within football codes account for confounding factors by implementing suitable study designs and statistical analysis techniques.
sport sciences