Abstract:BackgroundIn biomedical research, response variables are often encountered which have bounded support on the open unit interval - (0,1). Traditionally, researchers have attempted to estimate covariate effects on these types of response data using linear regression. Alternative modelling strategies may include: beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression, and fractional logit regression models. This study employs a Monte Carlo simulation design to compare the statistical properties of the linear regression model to that of the more novel beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression, and fractional logit regression models.MethodsIn the Monte Carlo experiment we assume a simple two sample design. We assume observations are realizations of independent draws from their respective probability models. The randomly simulated draws from the various probability models are chosen to emulate average proportion/percentage/rate differences of pre-specified magnitudes. Following simulation of the experimental data we estimate average proportion/percentage/rate differences. We compare the estimators in terms of bias, variance, type-1 error and power. Estimates of Monte Carlo error associated with these quantities are provided.ResultsIf response data are beta distributed with constant dispersion parameters across the two samples, then all models are unbiased and have reasonable type-1 error rates and power profiles. If the response data in the two samples have different dispersion parameters, then the simple beta regression model is biased. When the sample size is small (N0 = N1 = 25) linear regression has superior type-1 error rates compared to the other models. Small sample type-1 error rates can be improved in beta regression models using bias correction/reduction methods. In the power experiments, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression models have slightly elevated power compared to linear regression models. Similar results were observed if the response data are generated from a discrete multinomial distribution with support on (0,1).ConclusionsThe linear regression model, the variable-dispersion beta regression model and the fractional logit regression model all perform well across the simulation experiments under consideration. When employing beta regression to estimate covariate effects on (0,1) response data, researchers should ensure their dispersion sub-model is properly specified, else inferential errors could arise.

Nonnested hypothesis testing in the class of varying dispersion beta regressions

Specification Testing in Nonstationary Time Series Models

Characteristic Function-Based Testing for Multifactor Continuous-Time Markov Models Via Nonparametric Regression

A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design

M-Testing Using Finite and Infinite Dimensional Parameter Estimators

Bayesian Hypothesis Tests Using Nonparametric Statistics

Approach to Testing Nonlinear Time Series Models

Consistent Specification Testing Via Nonparametric Series Regression

Nonparametric Specification Testing for Continuous-Time Models with Application to Spot Interest Rates

Testing for Varying Dispersion in Exponential Family Nonlinear Models

A Joint Test for Parametric Specification and Independence in Nonlinear Regression Models

Local power of the LR, Wald, score and gradient tests in dispersion models

A Nonparametric Goodness-Of-Fit-Based Test for Conditional Heteroskedasticity

New goodness-of-fit diagnostics for conditional discrete response models

Likelihood analysis for a class of beta mixed models

Optimal heteroskedasticity testing in nonparametric regression

Inference on order restricted means of inverse Gaussian populations under heteroscedasticity

Testing for Varying Dispersion in Discrete Exponential Family Nonlinear Models

Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing

Research on the Validity of Bootstrap LM-Error Test in Spatial Random Effect Models

Robust Testing Procedures in Heteroscedastic Linear Models.