Abstract:Background Computer-aided detection software for automated breast ultrasound has been shown to have potential in improving the accuracy of radiologists. Alternative ways of implementing computer-aided detection, such as independent validation or preselecting suspicious cases, might also improve radiologists’ accuracy. Purpose To investigate the effect of using computer-aided detection software to improve the performance of radiologists by validating findings reported by radiologists during screening with automated breast ultrasound. Material and Methods Unilateral automated breast ultrasound exams were performed in 120 women with dense breasts that included 60 randomly selected normal exams, 30 exams with benign lesions, and 30 malignant cases (20 mammography-negative). Eight radiologists were instructed to detect breast cancer and rate lesions using BI-RADS and level-of-suspiciousness scores. Computer-aided detection software was used to check the validity of radiologists' findings. Findings found negative by computer-aided detection were not included in the readers’ performance analysis; however, the nature of these findings were further analyzed. The area under the curve and the partial area under the curve for an interval in the range of 80%–100% specificity before and after validation of computer-aided detection were compared. Sensitivity was computed for all readers at a simulation of 90% specificity. Results Partial AUC improved significantly from 0.126 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.098–0.153) to 0.142 (95% CI = 0.115–0.169) ( P = 0.037) after computer-aided detection rejected mostly benign lesions and normal tissue scored BI-RADS 3 or 4. The full areas under the curve (0.823 vs. 0.833, respectively) were not significantly different ( P = 0.743). Four cancers detected by readers were completely missed by computer-aided detection and four other cancers were detected by both readers and computer-aided detection but falsely rejected due to technical limitations of our implementation of computer-aided detection validation. In this study, validation of computer-aided detection discarded 42.6% of findings that were scored BI-RADS ≥3 by the radiologists, of which 85.5% were non-malignant findings. Conclusion Validation of radiologists’ findings using computer-aided detection software for automated breast ultrasound has the potential to improve the performance of radiologists. Validation of computer-aided detection might be an efficient tool for double-reading strategies by limiting the amount of discordant cases needed to be double-read.

The value of computer aided detection system FOR mammography in the breast cancer screening: single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial

The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review

Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study

Utility of Computer -Aided Detection in the Diagnosis of Breast Carcinoma with Mammography

Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review

Clinical Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis System in Breast Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis to Predict Malignancy in BI-RADS 3 Breast Lesions

Clinical Application of Computer-Aided Diagnosis According to S-Detect in Category 4 Breast Lesions: Prospective Single-Center Study (Preprint)

Validation of radiologists’ findings by computer-aided detection (CAD) software in breast cancer detection with automated 3D breast ultrasound: a concept study in implementation of artificial intelligence software

A Clinical Assessment of a Magnetic Resonance Computer-Aided Diagnosis System in the Detection of Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

The diagnostic performance of ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis system for distinguishing breast masses: a prospective multicenter study

Survival Outcomes of Screening with Breast MRI in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer

Pilot study: A simple CAD-based tool to detect breast cancer on MRI of the breast

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound with computer-aided diagnostic system in detecting breast cancer

Multimodality Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI

The message matters: changes to binary Computer Aided Detection recommendations affect cancer detection in low prevalence search

Value of automated breast ultrasound in screening: Standalone and as a supplemental to digital breast tomosynthesis

Test Sensitivity in the Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer from Clinical Mammographic Screening: a Meta-analysis

An Integrated Multimodal-Based CAD System for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

A computer-aided polyp detection system in screening and surveillance colonoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem trial