Abstract:Inaccurate bacterial taxonomic assignment in 16S-based microbiota experiments could have deleterious effects on research results, as all downstream analyses heavily rely on the accurate assessment of microbial taxonomy: a bias in the choice of the reference database can deeply alter microbiota biodiversity (alpha-diversity), composition (beta-diversity), and taxa profile (bacterial relative abundances). In this paper, we explored the influence of the reference 16S rRNA collection by performing a classification against four of the main databases used by the scientific community (i.e. Greengenes, SILVA, RDP, NCBI); the consequences of database clustering at 97% were also explored. To investigate the effects of the database choice on real and representative microbiome samples from different ecosystems, we performed a comparative analysis on four already published datasets from various sources: stools from a mouse model experiment, bovine milk, human gut microbiota stool samples, and swabs from the human vaginal environment. We took into consideration the computational time needed to perform the taxonomic classification as well. Although values in both alpha- and beta-diversity varied a lot, sometimes even statistically, according to the dataset chosen and the eventual clustering, the final outcome of the analysis was a concordance in the capability to retrieve the original experimental group differences over the various datasets. However, in the taxonomy classification, we found several inconsistencies with taxonomies correctly assigned in only some of the four databases. The degree of concordance among the databases was related to both the complexity of the environment and its degree of completeness in the reference databases. IMPORTANCE 16S rRNA sequencing is, nowadays, the most commonly used strategy for microbiota profiling in many different ecosystems, ranging from human-associated to animal models, food matrices, and environmental samples. The ability of this kind of analysis to correctly capture differences in the microbiota composition is related to the taxonomic classification of the fragments obtained from sequencing and, thus, to the choice of the best reference database. This paper deals with four of the most popular microbial databases, which were evaluated in their ability to reproduce the experimental evidence from four already published datasets. The knowledge of the advantages and drawbacks of the database choice can be pivotal for planning future experiments in the field, making researchers aware of the repercussions of such a choice according to the different environments under scrutiny. Moreover, this work can also shed new light upon past results, partially explaining discordant evidence.

Evaluation of the Performances of Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Classifier for Taxonomic Assignment of 16S rRNA Metabarcoding Sequences Generated from Illumina-Solexa NGS

Evaluation of the RDP Classifier Accuracy Using 16S rRNA Gene Variable Regions

Benchmarking of 16S rRNA gene databases using known strain sequences

Benchmarking bacterial taxonomic classification using nanopore metagenomics data of several mock communities

Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis

To compare the performance of prokaryotic taxonomy classifiers using curated 16S full-length rRNA sequences

riboFrame: An Improved Method for Microbial Taxonomy Profiling from Non-Targeted Metagenomics

16S-ITGDB: An Integrated Database for Improving Species Classification of Prokaryotic 16S Ribosomal RNA Sequences

A comparison between Greengenes, SILVA, RDP, and NCBI reference databases in four published microbiota datasets

Naïve Bayesian classifiers with multinomial models for rRNA taxonomic assignment

Metabarcoding free‐living marine nematodes using curated 18S and CO1 reference sequence databases for species‐level taxonomic assignments

Efficient and stable metabarcoding sequencing data using a DNBSEQ-G400 sequencer validated by comprehensive community analyses

Towards a Taxonomical Consensus: Diversity and Richness Inference from Large Scale rRNA gene Analysis

The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis

Improving Species Level‐taxonomic Assignment from 16S rRNA Sequencing Technologies

Mining underutilized whole-genome sequencing projects to improve 16S rRNA databases

Impact of training sets on classification of high-throughput bacterial 16s rRNA gene surveys

The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy

The effect of training set on the classification of honey bee gut microbiota using the Naïve Bayesian Classifier

16S Classifier: A Tool for Fast and Accurate Taxonomic Classification of 16S rRNA Hypervariable Regions in Metagenomic Datasets

RESCUE: a validated Nanopore pipeline to classify bacteria through long-read, 16S-ITS-23S rRNA sequencing