Abstract:In Chinese societies,kinship relations always play a very important role in social support due to the impact of Confucian culture.The establishment of the modern welfare system including social assistance and pensions hasshifted the overreliance on personal networks for social support to using the formal multi-level support system.Current scholars have studied social support from the network structural perspective.This paper tries to apply the social status perspective to the study of social support.At present there are two theoretical perspectives,ie,the theory of resource distribution and the theory of social status block,the former emphasizing how the distribution of economic resources and political power structure influence individuals ' network selection and utilization,and the latter emphasizing how social stratification controls people ' s social contact and interaction to influence the accessible network resources.Facing the theoretical limitations,the author proposes a new analytical framework of distribution of resource-structure of class '(DRSC) to examine the selection of social support by the urban citizens in the Chinese societies in East Asia based on the 2006 Asia Barometer Survey.The findings suggest that,in Mainland China,which had the Supplementary Welfare system,and in Hong Kong and Taiwan,which had the Productivist Welfare Capitalism, social status made significant differences in the selection of social support by the urban citizens.To be specific,when selecting the formal or mixed support,compared with Mainland China,educational status and selection of mixed social support networks produced higher positive coefficients among Hong Kong and Taiwan residents,whereas among Mainland Chinese,the higher positive coefficients were for the relationship between educational status and selection of formal social support.However,there was no difference in the impact of employment status on social support selection in the three regions.The new analytic framework received good empirical support.For social policies,justice in resource distribution is the key to resolving the class inequality in social support.

Multiple Modes of Wellbeing in Asia

Mental Health in Asia: Social Improvements and Challenges.

Section Overview

Complexifying Individualism Versus Collectivism and West Versus East: Exploring Global Diversity in Perspectives on Self and Other in the Gallup World Poll

Socioeconomic Status and Cultural Difference

Social Media Personalities in Asia: Demographics, Platform Preferences, and Behavior Based Analysis

Social Value Orientation and Capitalism in Societies

East Asian welfare regime: obsolete ideal-type or diversified reality

Wellbeing of the older individuals in East Asia

Welfare state regimes, infant mortality and life expectancy: integrating evidence from East Asia

A WEIRD Theory? On the Prevalence of Western Folk Theory of Social Change in the West and Asia

What Are Healthy Societies? A Thematic Analysis of Relevant Conceptual Frameworks

The welfare–work nexus in East Asia – a comparison of contexts, paths and directions

Perspective on Asian Welfare Economy and Social Security: an East-West Comparison

Religion, Spirituality, Globalization Reflected in Life Beliefs Among Urban Asian Indian Youth

A Study on Well-Being Marketing Strategy by Female Consumers' Types - Focusing on Well-Being Lifestyle -

Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

Asset indexes and the measurement of poverty, inequality and welfare in Southeast Asia

Future Business and Government Leaders of Asia: How Do They Differ and What Makes Them Tick?

Testing the bipolar assumption of Singer-Loomis Type Deployment Inventory for Korean adults using classification and multidimensional scaling

Distribution of Resources,Social Class,and Social Support:Comparisons of the Chinese Societies in East Asia