Abstract:OBJECTIVE Specialized instruments to screen and diagnose mental health problems in children and adolescents are not yet standard components of clinical assessments in emergency departments (EDs). We conducted a systematic review to investigate the psychometric properties, accuracy, and performance metrics of instruments used in the ED to identify pediatric mental health and substance use problems. METHODS We searched seven electronic databases and the gray literature for psychometric validation studies, diagnostic studies, and cohort studies that assessed any instrument to screen for or diagnose mental illness, emotional or behavioral problems, or substance use disorders. Studies had to include children and adolescents with mental health presentations or positive screens for substance use. Two reviewers independently screened studies for relevance and quality. Diagnostic study quality was assessed with the four QUADAS-2 domains. Psychometric study quality was assessed with published criteria for instrument reliability, validity, and usability. We present a descriptive analysis of the reported psychometric properties and diagnostic performance of instruments for each study. RESULTS Of the 4,832 references screened, 14 met inclusion criteria. Included studies evaluate 18 instruments for identifying suicide risk (six studies), alcohol use disorders (six studies), mood disorders (one study), and ED decision making (need for assessment, admission; one study). Nine studies include a psychometric focus but quality varies, with no studies fully meeting criteria for reliability, validity, and usability. Seven studies examine diagnostic performance of an instrument, but no study has a low risk of bias for all QUADAS-2 domains. The HEADS-ED instrument has good inter-rater reliability (r = 0.785) for identifying general mental health problems and modest evidence for ruling in patients requiring hospital admission (positive likelihood ratio [LR+] = 6.30). Internal consistency (reliability) varies for instruments to screen for suicide risk (α = 0.46-0.97), and no instruments have both high sensitivity and high specificity. The Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) is highly sensitive (98%) and has strong evidence for ruling out risk (negative likelihood ratio [LR-] = 0.04). Among screening instruments for alcohol use disorders, internal consistency is high for the consumption subscale of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (α = 0.83-0.88) and the Adolescent Drinking Index (α = 0.92). Both instruments also had sound internal validity. Diagnostically, a two-item instrument based on DSM-IV criteria is the most accurate in identifying patients with a disorder (area under the curve = 0.89) and has modest evidence for ruling in and out risk (LR+ = 8.80, LR- = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS From available evidence, we recommend that ED clinicians use 1) the HEADS-ED to rule in ED admission among pediatric patients with visits for mental health care, 2) the ASQ to rule out suicide risk among pediatric patients with any visit type, and 3) the DSM-IV two-item instrument to rule in/rule out alcohol use disorders among pediatric patients currently using alcohol. These instruments require minimal to no training or time commitment. We also recommend that clinicians become familiar with each instrument's psychometric properties to understand the quality of the evidence base. In this review, however, we identify methodologic limitations in the evidence base. To develop a robust evidence base, additional research is necessary.

Aortic Arch Calcification Predicts the Renal Function Progression in Patients with Stage 3 to 5 Chronic Kidney Disease

ICASE U TRIANGULAR SPECTRAL ELEMENTS FOR INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOW DTIC ELECTE

Aortic arch calcification increases major adverse cardiac event risk, modifiable by echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, in end-stage kidney disease patients

Abdominal Aortic Calcification is Not Superior over Other Vascular Calcification in Predicting Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients: a Retrospective Observational Study

Nutrition and Cancer Research: Resources for the Nutrition and Dietetics Practitioner.

Prognostic Risk Stratification of Cardiac Events Evaluated by Aortic Calcification in Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

The risk factors of aortic arch calcification in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Cardiac Function Across Chronic Kidney Disease Stages

Correlation between coronary calcification and cardiac structure in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease

Abdominal Aortic Calcification and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: Findings from KNOW-CKD Study

Prevalence and Correlates of Cardiovascular Calcification and Its Prognostic Effects Among Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Results From the C-STRIDE Study

Myosteatosis and aortic calcium score on abdominal CT as prognostic markers in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients

The association of echocardiographic parameters on renal outcomes in chronic kidney disease

Prognostic Implication of Longitudinal Changes in Cardiothoracic Ratio and Aortic Arch Calcification in Hemodialysis Patients

Coronary Artery Calcification Score and the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

Cardiac Remodeling on Echocardiogram is Related to Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury after Coronary Angiography: a Cross-Section Study

Predictive value of cardiac valve calcification for progression of coronary artery calcium in end stage renal disease patients

Association of serum creatinine with aortic arch calcification in middle-aged and elderly adults: an observational cross-sectional study from China

Rickettsia monacensis and Human Disease, Spain

Research Progress on the Relationship between Coronary Artery Calcification and Chronic Renal Failure

A Systematic Review of Instruments to Identify Mental Health and Substance Use Problems Among Children in the Emergency Department