Palatal Masticatory Mucosal Thickness, Anatomy and the Relationship to Age, Gender and Smoking
Zeqian Xu,Yining Wang,Yangge Du,Yongxi Liang,Shanshan Liang,Yi Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.110_13358
2018-01-01
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Abstract:Background Over the years, the increasing demand for dental aesthetics and functions has generated an increasing awareness on the quality and the quantity of peri-implant soft tissues, which contribute to favorable white red esthetic outcomes and healthy and stable peri-implant soft tissue sealing. The soft tissue graft harvest from palatal region is widely used to reach this goal. A clear understand of donor site anatomy characteristics is important for incision design and avoiding complications. Aim/Hypothesis This study aims to provide reference for soft tissue harvest in surgery design by evaluating the palatal mucosal thickness and the location of the great palatine foramen through CBCT. Meanwhile, this study aims at analysing the influence of age, gender and smoking towards the mucosal thickness. Material and Methods A total of 300 patients, 145 males and 155 females, from 19 to 78 years (mean age 42 years), were included in this study. Personal information such as gender, age and smoking history was recorded. CBCT images were obtained through the high resolution Newtom, reconstructed in NTT Viewer Workstation and analysed through SimPlant. The palatal mucosal thickness was measured from canine to second molar. Along the palatal arc from gingival margin to palatine suture, with a 3 mm of interval, a measure point was selected (Fig. 1). After perpendicular tangents were drawn through these points, the distance from each intersection of this perpendicular tangent to the palatal bone surface represent the thickness of the target soft tissue. The palatal width-height ratio was measured in the middle coronal plane of the first molar. The greater palatine foramen (GPF) locational relationship with molars were measured through axial reconstruction in coronal and horizontal plane. Results The mean palatal mucosal thickness was 3.30 ± 1.74 mm, increasing from canine to second molar, with values of 2.95 ± 1.21, 3.09 ± 1.40, 3.36 ± 1.59, 3.20 ± 1.70 and 4.18 ± 2.31 mm. From canine to the second molar, the palatal thickness was in an overall increasing trend, with a thinner thickness in first molar. In coronal plane, the mucosal thickness increased in 3–9 mm region, peaking at 9–12 mm region and decreasing in 12–24 mm region (Fig. 2). When analyze the 9 mm region of canine, there were respectively 0.67%, 10.10%, 45.79%, 43.44% of people with mucosal thickness of 1–2 mm, 2–3 mm, 3–4 mm, 4 mm . The thickness was positively correlated with age but negatively correlated with palatal width-to-height ratio. Masticatory mucosa was thicker in males than females and also thicker in smokers than nonsmokers. The great palatal foramen were located 23% in the distal of third molar, 39.33% in the middle of third molar, 35.33% in the distal of second molar, 2% in the middle of second molar. Conclusions and Clinical Implications In 9–12 mm region with high mucosal thickness, exist the GPA running from GPF. The safe harvest zone is 3–9 mm and from the first premolar to first molar. The high width-to-height ratio palate, which shows low palatal thickness, may increase the risk of hurting the palatal artery. Though the smokers appears with thicker palatal mucosa, the varying degrees of fibrosis, vessels situations and tissue fragility, which might influence the further tissue healing, requires further evaluation. FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2