Abstract:Extensive literature probes labor market discrimination through correspondence studies in which researchers send pairs of resumes to employers, which are closely matched except for social signals such as gender or ethnicity. Upon perceiving these signals, individuals quickly activate associated stereotypes. The Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske 2002) categorizes these stereotypes into two dimensions: warmth and competence. Our research integrates findings from correspondence studies with theories of social psychology, asking: Can discrimination between social groups, measured through employer callback disparities, be predicted by warmth and competence perceptions of social signals? We collect callback rates from 21 published correspondence studies, varying for 592 social signals. On those social signals, we collected warmth and competence perceptions from an independent group of online raters. We found that social perception predicts callback disparities for studies varying race and gender, which are indirectly signaled by names on these resumes. Yet, for studies adjusting other categories like sexuality and disability, the influence of social perception on callbacks is inconsistent. For instance, a more favorable perception of signals like parenthood does not consistently lead to increased callbacks, underscoring the necessity for further research. Our research offers pivotal strategies to address labor market discrimination in practice. Leveraging the warmth and competence framework allows for the predictive identification of bias against specific groups without extensive correspondence studies. By distilling hiring discrimination into these two dimensions, we not only facilitate the development of decision support systems for hiring managers but also equip computer scientists with a foundational framework for debiasing Large Language Models and other methods that are increasingly employed in hiring processes.

Employee Discrimination and Corporate Morale: Evidence from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

Unintended consequences of discrimination litigation caps

Employer Reputation and the Labor Market: Evidence from Glassdoor.com and Dice.com

Employee Turnover Likelihood and Earnings Management: Evidence from the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine

Strategic Choices for Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Marketization Degree, and the Executive-Employee Compensation Gap

Information in Unexpected Bonus Cuts: Firm Performance and CEO Firings

Higher Highs and Lower Lows: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in CEO Dismissal

Moral commitment to gender equality increases (mis)perceptions of gender bias in hiring

What Do Employees Know? Evidence from a Social Media Platform

Perceived Workplace Gender Discrimination and Employee Consequences: A Meta-Analysis and Complementary Studies Considering Country Context

Corporate Sexual Equality and Firm Performance

Perceiving Discrimination: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation in the Legal Workplace

Employment protection, corporate governance, and labor productivity around the World

Examining the effectiveness of interventions to reduce discriminatory behavior at work: An attitude dimension consistency perspective

CEO Risk Taking Equity Incentives and Workplace Misconduct

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

Gain from your pain: Firm stock market reactions to competitor firms' early CEO dismissal

Enforceability of Non-Compete Covenants, Discretionary Investments, and Financial Reporting Practices: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Corporate social responsibility, CEO characteristics, and earnings management: Evidence from China