Plant-derived nootropics and human cognition: A systematic review

Cristina Lorca,María Mulet,Catalina Arévalo-Caro,M Ángeles Sanchez,Ainhoa Perez,María Perrino,Anna Bach-Faig,Alicia Aguilar-Martínez,Elisabet Vilella,Xavier Gallart-Palau,Aida Serra,M. Ángeles Sanchez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.2021137
IF: 11.208
2022-01-03
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Abstract:Substances with modulatory capabilities on certain aspects of human cognition have been revered as nootropics from the dawn of time. The plant kingdom provides most of the currently available nootropics of natural origin. Here, in this systematic review, we aim to provide state-of-the-art information regarding proven and unproven effects of plant-derived nootropics (PDNs) on human cognition in conditions of health and disease. Six independent searches, one for each neurocognitive domain (NCD), were performed in parallel using three independent scientific library databases: PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus. Only scientific studies and systematic reviews with humans published between January 2000 and November 2021 were reviewed, and 256 papers were included. Ginkgo biloba was the most relevant nootropic regarding perceptual and motor functions. Bacopa monnieri improves language, learning and memory. Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) modulates anxiety and social-related cognitions. Caffeine enhances attention and executive functions. Together, the results from the compiled studies highlight the nootropic effects and the inconsistencies regarding PDNs that require further research.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.2021137.
food science & technology,nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?