Abstract:IntroductionMy patient was a smiling, unvaccinated 6-year-old boy. Halloween was around the corner, and we bonded over his Spider-Man costume. When we got to vaccines, however, the mood expectedly soured. They were "unnatural," his parents shared; the pharmaceutical industry was replete with liars and the CDC was bought. The only indication of progress since last visit's counseling was a new openness to the tetanus vaccine. They promised to think hard about it for next time but offered no explanation for why it was special. Perhaps they had a friend whose child fell sick with tetanus. I have often wondered if I should have dug more into it. What if I could have identified other vaccines that met their criteria?How should pediatricians respond to vaccine hesitancy?When it comes to persuading vaccine-hesitant families to vaccinate, pediatricians are understandably expected to do the legwork. Their offices administer vaccines, and the relationships they build with families, sometimes spanning generations, position them to address individual concerns and bridge to the broader medical establishment. The best option is for pediatricians to attempt to convince parents about the benefits of vaccination. There are evidence-based recommendations for how to most effectively communicate about vaccine recommendations, including using closed-ended statements, bundling discussions of multiple vaccines and giving regular affirmation as part of broader motivational interviewing.1 However, when best practices fail, some pediatricians consider dismissing vaccine-hesitant families from their practice. While this may be acceptable in extreme circumstances,3 it interrupts care continuity and arguably subverts professional values like tolerance that are central to caring for patients in a pluralistic society.4 Some have argued that child welfare services should become involved to engage the courts to compel immunization. However, vaccine refusal generally fails legal and ethical standards for overriding parental authority to make health-related decisions for their child.Weighing reliable protection from serious illness against relatively low risks for adverse health events, vaccination is widely regarded to be in a child's best interest. However, failure to act to maximally promote a child's interest is not sufficient to justify state intervention according to most interpretations of the best-interests standard.5 Moreover, state investigations can be disruptive and traumatizing, and the result in these cases is likely only to diminish trust in medical and governmental institutions. The harm principle and constrained parental autonomy model define stricter standards still.6,7 They require that the vaccine be highly efficacious with low morbidity and that not receiving it put the patient at serious risk of imminent harm, or according to the constrained parental autonomy model, deprive a child of their basic needs. Partly due to herd immunity, which protects the individual unvaccinated child, the standards are not met. The pediatrician treating a child in a persistently vaccine-resistant family is left with few good options; they may eventually decide to ignore the topic altogether. But what if instead they offered to compromise with those families on when or even which vaccines their child receives, working with them to develop a schedule that integrates their values and preferences with pressing public health realities? Is compromise ethical?The idea of any compromise on childhood vaccination understandably invites backlash. The CDC schedule reflects decades of careful study into immune system development on the one hand and infection spread patterns on the other. We know vaccination per the CDC schedule is safe and effective, but we do not know that for unofficial schedules. Some countries have experimented with prioritizing vaccines through selective mandates in response to outbreaks, but testing the effectiveness of these interventions is challenging in the short term, and there may even be decreased uptake of other vaccines.8 Responding to concerns about the quantity of shots administered in a single day, some pediatricians have published their own versions of the vaccine schedule, correctly condemned by experts as the substitution of limited experience for mountains of data. To our knowledge, none of these has been thoroughly studied. However, if some vaccination provides more protection than no vaccination—which follows from any individual vaccine efficacy study demonstrating protection against the specific disease as a health benefit —then it seems in the best interest of the child to receive even a reduced number of vaccines.Pediatricians have a responsibility to promote public health, but their principal responsibility is to the children they treat. So, after failing to convince parents to vaccinate per the standard CDC or catch-up schedule, a pediatrician might, for examp -Abstract Truncated-

Physician Response to Parental Requests to Spread Out the Recommended Vaccine Schedule

On compromising with vaccine-hesitant families

Delays in immunization have potentially serious health consequences

Patient concerns and physician strategies for addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy

Pediatricians' self-reported clinical practices and adherence to national immunization guidelines after the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

Characterizing timeliness of recommended vaccinations among privately-insured children in the United States, 2009-2019

Parental compliance and reasons for COVID-19 Vaccination among American children

COVID-19 Vaccination in Historically Marginalized Communities: Examining Barriers and Facilitators in a Pediatric Population

UK paediatricians' attitudes towards the chicken pox vaccine: The SPOTTY study

Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccine Experiences, Practices, and Attitudes in Rural Primary Care Clinicians

Pediatric Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine and Dosing Schedule Perceptions Among Health Care Providers and Caregivers in Germany, France, Spain, and Greece

Impact of a physician recommendation and parental immunization attitudes on receipt or intention to receive adolescent vaccines

Willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19 declined during the pandemic

Vaccine hesitancy among parents of children in their first two years of life

Health Care Personnel Attitudes Toward Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccines

Underimmunization among children: effects of vaccine safety concerns on immunization status

Differences in PCV13 Recommendation Practices between Pediatric Care Providers and Primary Care Providers in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Behavior and Social Drivers

Factors Associated with the Implementation of Pediatric Immunization Services: A Survey of Community Pharmacies

Understanding healthcare providers' preferred attributes of pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in the United States

Survey of Immunization Practices in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among Pediatric Gastroenterologists

Psychosocial correlates of parents' willingness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19