A Dual-Process Perspective on Fluency-Based Aesthetics

Laura K. M. Graf,Jan R. Landwehr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315574978

IF: 16.161

2015-03-05

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract:In this article, we develop an account of how aesthetic preferences can be formed as a result of two hierarchical, fluency-based processes. Our model suggests that processing performed immediately upon encountering an aesthetic object is stimulus driven, and aesthetic preferences that accrue from this processing reflect aesthetic evaluations of pleasure or displeasure. When sufficient processing motivation is provided by a perceiver’s need for cognitive enrichment and/or the stimulus’ processing affordance, elaborate perceiver-driven processing can emerge, which gives rise to fluency-based aesthetic evaluations of interest, boredom, or confusion. Because the positive outcomes in our model are pleasure and interest, we call it the Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking (PIA Model). Theoretically, this model integrates a dual-process perspective and ideas from lay epistemology into processing fluency theory, and it provides a parsimonious framework to embed and unite a wealth of aesthetic phenomena, including contradictory preference patterns for easy versus difficult-to-process aesthetic stimuli.

psychology, social

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the complex mechanism of the formation of aesthetic preferences. Specifically, the author aims to develop a model to explain the formation process of aesthetic preferences. This model can describe two different processing levels simultaneously and provide a concise theoretical framework to unify and explain a large number of aesthetic phenomena, including seemingly contradictory preference patterns.

### Problem Background
1. **Two Levels of Aesthetic Processing**
- First level: Aesthetic processing based on the initial "overall impression", which mainly depends on the perceiver's direct response to the stimulus.
- Second level: Aesthetic processing based on subsequent in - depth thinking and reflection, which requires the perceiver to conduct a more detailed analysis and understanding of the stimulus.
2. **Limitations of Existing Research**
- Most studies only focus on one of the processing levels or introduce too many processing steps, making the formation process of aesthetic preferences complex and difficult to understand.
- Empirical research usually only measures generalized preferences and likability and cannot reflect the specific processing process, resulting in inconsistent experimental results.

### Core Objectives of the Paper
The author hopes to propose a theoretical framework named "Pleasure - Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking (PIA Model)" by integrating the processing fluency theory and the dual - process perspective. This model aims to:

1. **Expand the Current Fluency Theory**: Not only explain aesthetic preferences based on the first level, but also introduce the processing mechanism of the second level, that is, aesthetic preferences formed through in - depth thinking and reflection.
2. **Clarify the Influencing Factors of Different Processing Levels**: Explain under what circumstances the perceiver will make aesthetic judgments based on which processing level, thereby enriching the understanding of aesthetic processing.
3. **Define Different Aspects of Aesthetic Evaluation**: Not only cover positive aesthetic pleasure and interest, but also include negative aesthetic aversion, confusion and boredom, providing clearer and more consistent definitions.

### Main Contributions
1. **Expand the Fluency Theory**: Introduce the second - level fluency processing mechanism to explain complex aesthetic preferences.
2. **Enrich the Understanding of Aesthetic Processing**: Propose how the perceiver's motivation affects their choice of different processing levels.
3. **Define Aesthetic Evaluation**: Provide a clearer theoretical basis for future empirical research.

In this way, the author hopes to provide a more comprehensive and concise theoretical framework in the field of aesthetic psychology to explain and predict the formation process of aesthetic preferences.