Abstract:Our study provides a novel method to predictive postoperative stem anteversion based on the principle of sagittal three‐point fixation of the prosthesis, which measured as the average anteversion of the anterior cortex at the lesser trochanter proximal base and posterior cortex 10 mm above the lesser trochanter proximal base before the total hip arthroplasty surgery. Background Preoperative evaluation of femoral anteversion to predict postoperative stem anteversion aids the selection of an appropriate prosthesis and optimizes the combined anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The conventional prediction methods are based on the femoral anteversion measurement at the location of the femoral head and/or neck. However, varied differences between femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion were demonstrated. This study investigated the predictive role of a new method based on the principle of sagittal three‐point fixation. Methods From January 2017 to December 2018, a total of 133 DDH hips that underwent THA were retrospectively analyzed. There were 76 Crowe type I, 27 type II, and 30 type III hips. The single‐wedge stem was used in 49 hips, and the double‐wedge stem was used in 84 hips. Preoperative native femoral anteversion at the femoral head–neck junction, anterior cortex anteversion at 2 levels of the lesser trochanter, posterior cortex anteversion at 5 levels of the femoral neck, and postoperative stem anteversion were measured using two‐dimensional computed tomography. Predictive anteversion by the new method was calculated as the average anteversion formed by the anterior cortex at the lesser trochanter and the posterior cortex at the femoral neck. Results For hips with different neck heights, different Crowe types, different stem types, or different femoral anteversions, native femoral anteversion showed widely varied differences and correlations with stem anteversion, with differences ranging from −1.27 ± 8.33° to −13.67 ± 9.47° and correlations ranging from 0.122 (p = 0.705, no correlation) to 0.813. Predictive anteversion formed by the anterior cortex at the lesser trochanter proximal base and posterior cortex 10 mm above the lesser trochanter proximal base showed no significant difference with stem anteversion, with less varied differences (0.92 ± 7.52°) and good to excellent correlations (r = 0.826). Conclusion Adopting our new method, predictive anteversion, measured as the average anteversion of the anterior cortex at the lesser trochanter proximal base and posterior cortex 10 mm above the lesser trochanter proximal base, predicted postoperative stem anteversion more reliably than native femoral anteversion.

Acoustic characteristics of broaching procedure for post-operative stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty

Weak hammering sounds are associated with postoperative subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty

Differences in acoustic parameters of hammering sounds between successful and unsuccessful initial cementless cup press-fit fixation in total hip arthroplasty

Differences in femoral component subsidence rate after THA using an uncemented collarless femoral stem: full weight-bearing with an enhanced recovery rehabilitation versus partial weight-bearing

Pure Alumina Bearings with Cementless Stems Versus Sandwich Bearings with Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Femoral Component Revision Using Extensively Porous-Coated Cementless Stem.

Adjustment of stem anteversion using tapered cone stem in total hip arthroplasty

Measurement of operative femoral anteversion during cementless total hip arthroplasty and influencing factors for using neck-adjustable femoral stem

Increased risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture with compaction compared with broaching in cementless THA: a single-center study of 6,788 hips

Analysis on association between sagittal stem alignment and early functional and radiological outcome following primary cementless total hip replacement

Alignment and mechanics evaluation for a compaction broach stem versus a blade style proximal press fit stem using 3-Dimensional planning

A New Method to Predict Postoperative Stem Anteversion in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Differences between two sequential uncemented stem sizes in total hip arthroplasty: A comparative biomechanical study and potential clinical implications

Modelling changes in modular taper micromechanics due to surgeon assembly technique in total hip arthroplasty

The effect of stem design on the prevalence of squeaking following ceramic-on-ceramic bearing total hip arthroplasty

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of a Straight and an Anatomical Uncemented Stem

Improving planning and post-operative assessment for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical, radiographic, and scintigraphic comparison of the mechanical stability of Mueller and Zweymueller total hip prostheses

Ex vivo estimation of cementless femoral stem stability using an instrumented hammer

Does the Cementless, Hydroxyapatite on Porous, Long-stem Prosthesis Perform Well in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Multicenter Observation.

Middle-term outcome and complications after primary total hip arthroplasty using a contemporary titanium tapered wedge cementless femoral stem