Assessment of work intensification by managers and psychological distressed and non-distressed employees: a multilevel comparison

Simon Grandjean BAMBERGER,Anelia LARSEN,Anker Lund VINDING,Peter NIELSEN,Kirsten FONAGER,René Nesgaard NIELSEN,RYOM Pia,Øyvind OMLAND,Pia RYOM
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0176
2015-01-01
Industrial Health
Abstract:Work intensification is a popular management strategy to increase productivity, but at the possible expense of employee mental stress. This study examines associations between ratings of work intensification and psychological distress, and the level of agreement between compared employee-rated and manager-rated work intensification. Multi-source survey data were collected from 3,064 employees and 573 company managers from the private sector in 2010. Multilevel regression models were used to compare different work intensification ratings across psychological distress strata. Distressed employees rated higher degree of total work intensification compared to non-distressed employees, and on three out of five sub ratings there were an increased prevalence of work intensification in the case group. In general, there was poor agreement between employee and company work intensification rating. Neither manager-rated work intensification nor employee/manager discrepancy in work intensification ratings was associated with psychological distress. Distressed employees had a higher total score of employee/manager agreed work intensification, and a higher prevalence of increased demands of labour productivity. This study demonstrates higher ratings of employee/manager agreed work intensification in distressed employees compared to non-distressed employees, challenging previous findings of reporting bias in distressed employees' assessment of work environment.
public, environmental & occupational health,toxicology,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?