Abstract:Abstract The European Union’s Green Deal proposal and Farm to Fork strategy call for both demand and supply measures to reduce emissions from the food system. While research clearly illustrates the importance of dietary transitions, impacts of potential supply-side measures are not well understood in relation to competitiveness concerns and leakage effects. This study assesses trade and GHG emission impacts of two supply-side mitigation strategies (intensification vs. extensification) in the EU, UK and Switzerland (EU + 2), against a 2050 baseline featuring healthy/sustainable diets adopted by European consumers. To capture potential leakage effects arising from changing external trade flows, the two supply-side strategies are assessed against three trade policy regimes (i.e. status quo, regional trade liberalization with and without border carbon adjustment), resulting in six scenarios formulated with detailed inputs from the EUCalc model and other literature and simulated with a purported-designed CGE model. Results show that intensification, while improving the EU + 2’s external trade balance, does not reduce emissions in the EU + 2, compared to the baseline. In contrast, extensification leads to a substantial emission abatement that augments reductions from the assumed dietary transition in the baseline, resulting in a combined 31% agricultural emission reduction in EU + 2 during 2014–2050. However, this is at the expense of reduced net agrifood exports by US$25 billion compared to the baseline and significant carbon leakage at a rate of 48% (i.e. nearly half of agricultural emission reduction in the EU + 2 ‘leaked’ to elsewhere). Furthermore, implementing the EU + 2’s prospective regional trade agreements results in increased territorial emissions. Although a border carbon adjustment by the EU + 2 can improve its trade balance and partially shift mitigation burdens to other countries, the associated reductions in global emissions (and carbon leakage) would be marginal. Finally, different trade and emission effects are identified between the crop and livestock sectors, pointing to the desirability of a mixed agriculture system with intensified livestock sector and extensified crop agriculture in the EU + 2 that balances emission reduction goals and competitiveness concerns.

The role of international trade in managing food security risks from climate change

Global hunger and climate change adaptation through international trade

Impacts of climate change on global food trade networks

Impacts of supply-side climate change mitigation practices and trade policy regimes under dietary transition: the case of European agriculture

The nexus between international trade, food systems, malnutrition and climate change

Impact of climate change on international trade and economy: challenges and opportunities

Climate Change Impacts on China's Agriculture: the Responses from Market and Trade

Trade for Food Security: The Stability of Global Agricultural Trade Networks

Food and nutrition security under global trade: a relation-driven agent-based global trade model

Role of market agents in mitigating the climate change effects on food economy

Virtual Land Trade and Associated Risks to Food Security in China

Europe's cross-border trade, human security and financial connections: A climate risk perspective

Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy

Understanding the Spatial Distribution of Welfare Impacts of Global Warming on Agriculture and its Drivers

The structure, dynamics, and vulnerability of the global food trade network

A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation

Trade vulnerability assessment in the grain-importing countries: A case study of China

A Dynamic Evolutionary Analysis of the Vulnerability of Global Food Trade Networks

Trade and Climate Mitigation Interactions Create Agro‐Economic Opportunities With Social and Environmental Trade‐Offs in Latin America and the Caribbean

Virtual water scarcity risk to global trade under climate change

Snowmelt Risk Telecouplings for Irrigated Agriculture