1944 Battle of Serbia

Zorić Mirjana,Mirjana Zoric
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1403266z
2014-01-01
Vojno delo
Abstract:This year, this autumn exactly, we are celebrating another major anniversary - 70 years since the liberation of Serbia in the World War Two. If one bears in mind that Serbia was a key country of the military and political turn of events in Yugoslavia in 1944, when, in fact, the fate of the war was resolved in Yugoslavia and the Southeast Europe as a whole, our interest in this topic is fully justified. At the time when the events in other battlefields of Europe during the second half of 1944 were ever more directly announcing also a battle for the Balkans, Serbia, as its strategic axes, was becoming ever increasingly important for the German Wehrmacht, especially the communications that linked the German Reich over this territory to the forces located in Greece, Albania and Bulgaria. Due to the advance of Soviet forces towards the Balkans and the danger of a united front of allies being formed in southeastern Europe, the German command turned to strictly military measures as of mid-1944, in order to prevent, through decisive defense of Serbia ('inside and outside') and plans for the formation of a new front on the line Albania-Skopje-Iron Gate, the meeting of People's Liberation Army and the Soviet armies on the territory of Serbia, and subsequently, when they had to leave the Balkans, to enable the drawing of their own forces out of Greece along the approach Vardar-Morava towards Belgrade, and, together with other German forces in Serbia, their transfer across the Sava and the Danube rivers towards the north. In addition to its strategic and geopolitical importance, and regarding the German interests in the Balkans and the plans of allies (the USSR and Great Britain) on the division of spheres of interest in the South East of Europe after the war, Serbia was also at the national level the key to the Yugoslav military and political outcome in the autumn of 1944. As the war in Yugoslavia had characteristics of a civil war as well, the issue of Serbia's leadership of the Partisan and Chetnik Movements (Broz and Mihajlović in particular) was closely linked with the issue of seizure of power in Yugoslavia after the war.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?