Abstract:We identified several populations of cycling cells in representatives of an early‐branching group of animals, sponges Halisarca dujardinii and Leucosolenia corallorrhiza. The most proliferative cell type, food‐entrapping cells called choanocytes, was studied in terms of cell cycle dynamics using various experimental approaches, including S‐phase synchronization, treatment with labeled nucleotides EdU, and flow cytometry. Choanocytes in the species we studied make up a large population of relatively slowly cycling cells. Sponges (phylum Porifera) exhibit surprisingly complex tissue dynamics, maintaining constant cell turnover and migration, rearranging internal structures, and regenerating after severe injuries. Such tissue plasticity relies on the activity of proliferating cells represented primarily by the food‐entrapping cells, choanocytes. Although there are plenty of studies regarding the dynamics of regeneration and tissue rearrangement in sponges, cell cycle kinetics of choanocytes in intact tissues remains a controversial issue. This study is devoted to the comparative description of choanocyte cell cycle dynamics in intact tissues of two sponges, Halisarca dujardinii (class Demospongiae) and Leucosolenia corallorrhiza (class Calcarea). We have identified populations of proliferating cells and synchronized them in the S‐phase to estimate the growth fraction of cycling cells. Using continuous exposure to labeled thymidine analog ethynyl deoxyuridine (EdU), we calculated choanocyte cell cycle duration and the length of the S phase. We also applied double labeling with EdU and antibodies against phosphorylated histone 3 to estimate the lengths of choanocyte M and G2 phases. Finally, flow‐cytometry‐based quantitative analysis of DNA content provided us with the lengths of G2 and G1 phases. We found that tissue growth and renewal in the studied sponges are generally maintained by a relatively large population of slowly cycling choanocytes with a total cell cycle duration of 40 h in H. dujardinii and 60 h in L. corallorrhiza. In both species, choanocytes are characterized by an extremely short M‐phase and heterogeneity in the duration of the G2 phase.

Cell cycle reentry from the late S phase: implications from stem cell formation in the moss Physcomitrella patens

Cell Cycle Heterogeneity Directs Spontaneous 2C State Entry and Exit in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.

Progress in Physiological Functions and Molecular Regulations of Endoreduplication in Higher Plants

A General G1/S-Phase Cell-Cycle Control Module in the Flowering Plant Arabidopsis thaliana

Cell Cycle and Pluripotency: Convergence on Octamer-Binding Transcription Factor 4 (Review)

Physcomitrella STEMIN transcription factor induces stem cell formation with epigenetic reprogramming

Cytokinin and ALOG proteins regulate pluripotent stem cell identity in the moss Physcomitrium patens

Regulation of stem cell maintenance by the Polycomb protein FIE has been conserved during land plant evolution

Fundamental mechanisms of the stem cell regulation in land plants: lesson from shoot apical cells in bryophytes

Cycling in a crowd: Coordination of plant cell division, growth, and cell fate

Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of gametophyte development in Physcomitrella patens

Proliferation maintains the undifferentiated status of stem cells: The role of the planarian cell cycle regulator Cdh1

Cycling to Meet Fate: Connecting Pluripotency to the Cell Cycle

Linking the Cell Cycle to Cell Fate Decisions

A CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) gene essential for gametophore morphogenesis in the moss Physcomitrella patens

Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Regeneration from Differentiated Cells: Approaches from Historical Tissue Culture Systems

Cell cycle dynamics of food‐entrapping cells of sponges: an experimental approach

Transcriptional repression and enhancer decommissioning silence cell cycle genes in postmitotic tissues

Quantifying the Landscape and Transition Paths for Proliferation-Quiescence Fate Decisions

Plant germline formation: common concepts and developmental flexibility in sexual and asexual reproduction