Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents

Kimberly G Noble,Suzanne M Houston,Natalie H Brito,Hauke Bartsch,Eric Kan,Joshua M Kuperman,Natacha Akshoomoff,David G Amaral,Cinnamon S Bloss,Ondrej Libiger,Nicholas J Schork,Sarah S Murray,B J Casey,Linda Chang,Thomas M Ernst,Jean A Frazier,Jeffrey R Gruen,David N Kennedy,Peter Van Zijl,Stewart Mostofsky,Walter E Kaufmann,Tal Kenet,Anders M Dale,Terry L Jernigan,Elizabeth R Sowell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3983

IF: 25

2015-03-30

Nature Neuroscience

Abstract:Socioeconomic status is associated with cognitive development, but the extent to which this reflects neuroanatomical differences is unclear. In 1,099 children and adolescents, family income was nonlinearly associated with brain surface area, and this association was greatest among disadvantaged children. Further, surface area mediated links between income and executive functioning.

neurosciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES, including family income and parental education level) and the brain structure of children and adolescents, especially how these factors affect the cortical surface area and thickness, as well as the changes in the volume of the hippocampus and amygdala. The research aims to understand the specific impact of SES on brain development, whether these impacts are independent of genetic ancestry, and to explore whether the connection between SES and neurocognitive ability is mediated by the brain surface area.

Specifically, the paper focuses on the following key issues:
1. **The relationship between SES and cortical surface area**: The study found that there is a linear positive correlation between parental education level and the cortical surface area of children, while there is a logarithmic positive correlation between family income and the cortical surface area. That is, in lower - income families, a small increase in income has a greater impact on the cortical surface area.
2. **The relationship between SES and cortical thickness**: The study did not find a significant association between parental education level and cortical thickness, but there is a marginally significant positive correlation between family income and cortical thickness.
3. **The relationship between SES and hippocampal volume**: The study found that there is a significant positive correlation between parental education level and the volume of the left hippocampus, and this association is more obvious among parents with a low education level.
4. **The relationship between SES and amygdala volume**: The study did not find a significant association between SES and amygdala volume.
5. **The relationship between brain surface area and neurocognitive ability**: The study found that the brain surface area partially mediates the relationship between family income and the performance of some executive function tasks, but does not mediate the relationship between income and vocabulary or reading ability.

Through these studies, the paper hopes to reveal the specific mechanisms of SES on brain development and provide a scientific basis for formulating relevant policies, especially in terms of intervention measures for low - income families.