Priming with a Simplified Intradermal HIV-1 DNA Vaccine Regimen followed by Boosting with Recombinant HIV-1 MVA Vaccine Is Safe and Immunogenic: A Phase IIa Randomized Clinical Trial

Patricia. J. Munseri,Arne Kroidl,Charlotta Nilsson,Agricola Joachim,Christof Geldmacher,Philipp Mann,Candida Moshiro,Said Aboud,Eligius Lyamuya,Leonard Maboko,Marco Missanga,Bahati Kaluwa,Sayoki Mfinanga,Lilly Podola,Asli Bauer,Karina Godoy-Ramirez,Mary Marovich,Bernard Moss,Michael Hoelscher,Frances Gotch,Wolfgang Stöhr,Richard Stout,Sheena McCormack,Britta Wahren,Fred Mhalu,Merlin L. Robb,Gunnel Biberfeld,Eric Sandström,Muhammad Bakari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119629
IF: 3.7
2015-04-15
PLoS ONE
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Intradermal priming with HIV-1 DNA plasmids followed by HIV-1MVA boosting induces strong and broad cellular and humoral immune responses. In our previous HIVIS-03 trial, we used 5 injections with 2 pools of HIV-DNA at separate sites for each priming immunization. The present study explores whether HIV-DNA priming can be simplified by reducing the number of DNA injections and administration of combined versus separated plasmid pools.METHODS: In this phase IIa, randomized trial, priming was performed using 5 injections of HIV-DNA, 1000 μg total dose, (3 Env and 2 Gag encoding plasmids) compared to two "simplified" regimens of 2 injections of HIV-DNA, 600 μg total dose, of Env- and Gag-encoding plasmid pools with each pool either administered separately or combined. HIV-DNA immunizations were given intradermally at weeks 0, 4, and 12. Boosting was performed intramuscularly with 108 pfu HIV-MVA at weeks 30 and 46.RESULTS: 129 healthy Tanzanian participants were enrolled. There were no differences in adverse events between the groups. The proportion of IFN-γ ELISpot responders to Gag and/or Env peptides after the second HIV-MVA boost did not differ significantly between the groups primed with 2 injections of combined HIV-DNA pools, 2 injections with separated pools, and 5 injections with separated pools (90%, 97% and 97%). There were no significant differences in the magnitude of Gag and/or Env IFN-γ ELISpot responses, in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses measured as IFN-γ/IL-2 production by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) or in response rates and median titers for binding antibodies to Env gp160 between study groups.CONCLUSIONS: A simplified intradermal vaccination regimen with 2 injections of a total of 600 μg with combined HIV-DNA plasmids primed cellular responses as efficiently as the standard regimen of 5 injections of a total of 1000 μg with separated plasmid pools after boosting twice with HIV-MVA.TRIAL REGISTRATION: World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform PACTR2010050002122368.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?