Abstract:Summary form only given. The evaluation of the performance of R&D in China began in the 1950s, and a number of relative theories, methods and tools have been developed in the past decades. Especially, the rising costs of R&D and the increasing dependence of companies on technology for competitive advantage are causing both external investors and managers to identify the outcomes of R&D activities. As a result, the evaluation and measurement on the R&D performance by which to check the productivity, impacts and efficiency of R&D activities has became more and more important since the 1990s. The R&D activities in China involve scientific explorations, programs and projects in firms, universities and public or private research organizations. The universities and research organizations of China play a more important role than firms in R&D, especially in the field of both basic science research and applied research. It is very important to evaluate the R&D performance of universities and research organizations in China. Many popular methods and tools, such as peer review, econometrics, scientometrics, AHP, integrated indicators, are widely used in the evaluation practice, notwithstanding their own problems or limitations. It is noticeable that the internal performance of organizations' R&D activities, such as papers published, designs produced, patents, as well as R&D/sales are paid more addition to, and more relative evaluation methods are developed and adopted, while the external impacts of R&D are comparatively ignored. Generally speaking, the current evaluation work has had less of an impact and role that they deserve. This article gives a systemic summary and analysis on the current evaluation theories and methods for R&D performance, and in the meanwhile, their limitations and drawbacks are also pointed out. Based on the analysis of the characteristics and importance of the R&D activities in the coming knowledge-based economy, some promising theories and approaches with high operability and practicability are introduced by which to evaluate the R&D performance effectively.

Assessing the Effectiveness of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for R&D Project Proposal Evaluations

Evaluating R&D Effectiveness: a Study on Chinese Practice and Trend

Measuring R&D Effectiveness—I

Managing innovative R&D teams

Industrial R&D project portfolio selection method using a multi-objective optimization program: A conceptual quantitative framework

R&D Project Selection Incorporating Customer-Perceived Value and Technology Potential: The Case of the Automobile Industry

A Performance Evaluation Model on R&D - A Notebook Manufacturer Study.

Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management

A Group Decision Support Approach to Evaluate Experts for R&D Project Selection

A Lack of Insight: An Experimental Analysis of R&D Managers’ Decision Making in Innovation Portfolio Management

A Conceptual Framework for Ranking R&D Projects

Qualitative cost–benefit evaluation of complex, emergent programs

Managing Knowledge Creation in High-Tech R&D Projects: A Multimethod Study

Using a Mixed Model to Evaluate Job Satisfaction in High-Tech Industries

R\&D evaluation methodology based on group-AHP with uncertainty

Resolving Uncertainty in R&D Portfolios

Selecting R&D projects at BMW: a case study of adopting mathematical programming models

Research On Partner Selection Decision-Making Of The Strategic Alliance Of R&D Projects

Enhancing R&D Performance Management: A Case of R&D Projects in South Korea

Creation of a System for Managing and Coordinating Research and Development Activities at High-Tech Enterprises

Identification and Prioritisation of Risk Factors in R&D Projects Based on an R&D Process Model