Abstract:Background. The Journal Citation Reports journal impact factors (JIFs) are widely used to rank and evaluate journals, standing as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field. However, numerous criticisms have been made of use of a JIF to evaluate importance. This problem is exacerbated when the use of JIFs is extended to evaluate not only the journals, but the papers therein. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the relationship between the number of citations and journal IF for identical articles published simultaneously in multiple journals. Methods. Eligible articles were consensus research reporting statements listed on the EQUATOR Network website that were published simultaneously in three or more journals. The correlation between the citation count for each article and the median journal JIF over the published period, and between the citation count and number of article accesses was calculated for each reporting statement. Results. Nine research reporting statements were included in this analysis, representing 85 articles published across 58 journals in biomedicine. The number of citations was strongly correlated to the JIF for six of the nine reporting guidelines, with moderate correlation shown for the remaining three guidelines (median r = 0.66, 95% CI [0.45–0.90]). There was also a strong positive correlation between the number of citations and the number of article accesses (median r = 0.71, 95% CI [0.5–0.8]), although the number of data points for this analysis were limited. When adjusted for the individual reporting guidelines, each logarithm unit of JIF predicted a median increase of 0.8 logarithm units of citation counts (95% CI [−0.4–5.2]), and each logarithm unit of article accesses predicted a median increase of 0.1 logarithm units of citation counts (95% CI [−0.9–1.4]). This model explained 26% of the variance in citations (median adjusted r 2 = 0.26, range 0.18–1.0). Conclusion. The impact factor of the journal in which a reporting statement was published was shown to influence the number of citations that statement will gather over time. Similarly, the number of article accesses also influenced the number of citations, although to a lesser extent than the impact factor. This demonstrates that citation counts are not purely a reflection of scientific merit and the impact factor is, in fact, auto-correlated.

Is There a Need for a New Journal Metric? Correlations between Jcr Impact Factor Metrics and the Journal Citation Indicator - Jci

The Citation-Based Indicator and Combined Impact Indicator-New Options for Measuring Impact

Comparing journals from different fields of Science and Social Science through a JCR Subject Categories Normalized Impact Factor

A Comparison among Citation-Based Journal Indicators and Their Relative Changes with Time

Questioning the Impact of the Impact Factor. A Brief Review and Future Directions

An indicator of the impact of journals based on the percentage of their highly cited publications

The Journal’s Integrated Impact Index: a new indicator for journal evaluation

I3: A Non-Parametric Alternative to the Journal Impact Factor.

An indicator of journal impact that is based on calculating a journal's percentage of highly cited publications

The Integrated Impact Indicator Revisited (I3*): a Non-Parametric Alternative to the Journal Impact Factor

A proposal for a novel impact factor as an alternative to the JCR impact factor

Auto-correlation of journal impact factor for consensus research reporting statements: a cohort study

The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects

Variations in Citations Across Databases: Implications for Journal Impact Factors

The Journal's Integrated Impact Index

Providing impact: The distribution of JCR journals according to references they contribute to the 2-year and 5-year journal impact factors

How Can Journal Impact Factors Be Normalized Across Fields of Science? an Assessment in Terms of Percentile Ranks and Fractional Counts

The Journal Impact Factor is under attack – use the CAPCI factor instead

THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED: NURTURING A MEDICAL JOURNAL'S QUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL INDEXATION AND IMPACT FACTOR

Comparison of evaluation indexes for Gastroenterology and Hepatology journals in different databases

Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor