Abstract:Immigration was the most distinctive policy issue debated in the 2016 presidential election. The issue dominated the election in sharp contrast to every other election in U.S. history, where it was generally a minor concern. In his first speech announcing his candidacy for president, then-candidate Donald J. Trump argued that immigration, legal and illegal, posed a serious problem for the United States. He said, Mexico is "sending people that have lots of problems.... They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." Trump's criticism hinges on the economic impact of immigrants. His unexpected victory put immigration at the front and center of the national debate and forced us to take his policy recommendations seriously. Candidate Trump emphasized border security and a border wall to stop illegal immigration, but he also spoke about his desire to restrict legal immigration. His statement of principles on immigration, if turned into law, would cut legal immigration by about twothirds and potentially halt illegal immigration. This edition of Cato Journal brings together leading scholars who have written widely on the economics of immigration. They presented their research at a Cato Institute conference on "The Economics of Immigration" on September 2, 2016, funded by the generous support of the Searle Freedom Trust and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. This volume is based on their conference papers, which summarize some of their most relevant and interesting findings related to the economics of immigration. As President Trump finishes his first year without significant new immigration legislation, this volume is published at just the right time to add to the public debate. In the language of economics, Trump's criticism of immigrants is that the costs they impose on American society exceed the benefits they produce. Although he focuses on their supposed criminal behavior, the low rate of immigrant incarceration and falling crime rates in areas with more immigrants indicate that this is not a serious argument against immigration. The human capital component of his complaint is more subtle but also more serious. Immigrants do tend to be less educated than natives although the gap is narrowing. Their lower levels of human capital mean that they are generally less productive and thus earn lower wages, potentially competing with many lower-skilled Americans. Immigration could have an overall positive effect on American economic growth but lower wages for Americans at the low end of the labor market. The articles by Giovanni Peri, Ethan Lewis, and Alan de Brauw, show that is not the case. They find immigration has had only a small effect on the wages of native-born Americans. Although the impact of immigrants on the labor market gets the most attention in public policy debates, the impact on the housing market is also important. The next three articles discuss that aspect of immigration. Gary Painter examines how immigrants make housing decisions and how those decisions affect local housing markets. Susan Wachter explains how natives and immigrants sort themselves after settling here and how they impact neighborhoods, and Jacob Vigdor explores how immigrants affect county-level economic indicators such as housing prices and finds that they add trillions of dollars in value to the national housing stock. …

A narrowing gyre? The Lega Nord and the shifting balance of Italian immigration policy

From narrative to counter-narrative: the European constraint and the rise of Italian populist Euroscepticism

THE ELECTORAL SUCCESS OF THE (NORTHERN) LEAGUE IN ITALY (2008-2018). IS THE ECONOMIC DECLINE OR THE IDENTITARIAN ISSUES THE MAIN REASON FOR IT?

Controlling Immigrants: The Latent Function of Italian Administrative Orders

The populist parties and their electoral success: different causes behind different populisms? The case of the Five-star Movement and the League

Immigration policy and birth weight: Positive externalities in Italian law

Narratives of Italian Transatlantic (re)migration, 1897-1936

Why Regions Matter in Immigrant Integration Policies: North Rhine-Westphalia and Emilia-Romagna in Comparative Perspective

Migration and natives' inequality: Evidence from Italian local labor markets

From culture to class - legitimate boundary making in German immigration debates on Southern and Eastern Europeans

The Historical Evolution of the Regional Populist Strategies of the Italian Lega Nord and a Comment on Its Future Prospects

A comparison of attitudes towards immigrants from the perspective of the political party vote

La representación social de los migrantes durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Un estudio de caso italiano sobre narrativas hostiles y comunicación política visual

From governmental success to governmental breakdown: how a new dimension of conflict tore apart the politics of migration of the Swedish centre-right

The polarizing impact of numeracy, economic literacy, and science literacy on attitudes toward immigration

Detecting Foreigners’ Spatial Residential Patterns in Urban Contexts: Two Tales from Italy

Predicting the rise of right-wing populism in response to unbalanced immigration

Varieties of populism: insights from the Italian case

Networked partisanship and framing: a socio-semantic network analysis of the Italian debate on migration

Winners and losers of immigration

Introduction: The Economics of Immigration