Introduction: On Transcultural Memory and Reception
Barbara Törnquist-Plewa,A. Erll,Tea Sindbæk Andersen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352353_002
2017-08-29
Abstract:In the autumn of 2012, the sculpture The Black Cone by the Spanish artist Santiago di Sierra was placed in front of the Parliament of Iceland, on Reykjavik’s symbolic square Austurvöllur. The Black Cone was intended to commemorate the massive public protests, the so-called ‘pots and pans revolution’ in Iceland 2008–2009 against the politicians held responsible for the country’s financial crash. While the majority of Reykjavik’s city council in 2012 agreed to accept the artist’s donation of the monument, council members were divided on the issue and it did raise controversies.1 Yet, since 2012 the monument has largely vanished from public attention.2 Perhaps its shape – a natural rock with a ridge created by a small black cone – allows it to remain unnoticed or casually overlooked as one of several organic parts of the square. How are we to understand this lack of explicit reactions to di Sierra’s monument? Is it rejection, purposeful ignoring, or simply indifference? At the very least we can say that as by 2016, no one has taken ownership or re-appropriated the monument as a memorial representation for her or his own purposes.3 When in 2012 Christopher Clark published the book The Sleepwalkers. How Europe Went to War in 1914 as yet another attempt to analyze the causes of the outbreak of the First World War, reactions were numerous. Published strategically at the advent of the war’s centenary by a renowned Cambridge historian, The Sleepwalkers was reviewed in newspapers and history journals across Europe, sometimes with acclaim and sometimes with lukewarm appreciation.4 Clark’s account was also included in several scholarly review articles that
History,Psychology,Political Science,Sociology,Art