Abstract:Purpose With over 3,000 academic journals in the fields of Business and Economics, most academics face a hard time selecting an adequate journal to submit their work to. In today's demanding academic environment and with the presence of different journal ranking lists (JRLs), the selection becomes more difficult when considering employment, promotion and funding. The purpose of this paper is to explore key differences among multiple JRLs pertinent to the latter common objectives. An extensive analysis is conducted to compare the content of journals in the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality list, Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) in the fields of Business and Economics. Then, a case of a university with medium research output is considered where scholarly performance evaluation is based on the ABDC Journal Quality List. Design/methodology/approach After ranking journals in the fields of Business and Economics based on SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator, JCR's Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and JCR's Eigenfactor (EF), a methodology is proposed to categorize journals in the three JRLs into the same categorization adopted by ABDC. The latter establishes a way to compare the four JRLs under consideration and serves as a basis to compare and analyze the content of journals in the ABDC Journal Quality list, Scopus and WoS. As a proxy impact metric, a normalized citation count is associated with each article based on Google Scholar. The publications of the considered university are then evaluated from the perspective of the four JRLs in terms of citation-based impact and quality while considering the exposure to popular world university ranking tables. Findings For journals classified under fourth tier by ABDC, over 53 and 59% are not indexed by Scopus and WoS, respectively. In this case study, over 42% of the publications appear in journals that are not listed in JCR despite the fact that over 94% of them are listed by the SJR list. Generally, publications that appear in journals listed by JCR achieve, on a yearly average, significantly higher citation rates when compared to those that appear in journals listed in ABDC and SJR Lists. Originality/value A four-tier mapping is proposed for consistent comparison among JRLs. Normalized citation count associated with each article based on Google Scholar is employed for evaluation. The findings provide recommendations for scholars, administrators and global universities, including Euro-Med Universities, on which JRL can be more influential for both faculty development and positioning of the university.

Research Performance of Marketing Academics and Departments: An International Comparison

MEASURING RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY OF MARKETING SCHOLARS AND MARKETING DEPARTMENTS

Citation Analysis of Marketing Research: Key Contributions and Future Directions

R2M Index 1.0: Assessing the Practical Relevance of Academic Marketing Articles

Research Constituents, Intellectual Structure, and Collaboration Patterns in Journal of International Marketing: An Analytical Retrospective

The current research landscape in digital marketing scientific literature in libraries: exploration through performance and science mapping

Measuring COVID-19’s impact on international HE students and intervention satisfaction: implications for marketing theory and practice

Comparative Study of Trace Metrics between Bibliometrics and Patentometrics

Which journal ranking list? A case study in business and economics

A Review of Marketing Performance Evaluation Theory

Mapping research in marketing: trends, influential papers and agenda for future research

Past, present and future of bank marketing: a bibliometric analysis of International Journal of Bank Marketing (1983–2020)

What counts: Making sense of metrics of research value

Benefit of the doubt approach to assessing the research performance of Australian universities

The State of Artificial Intelligence in Marketing With Directions for Future Research

A bibliometric and visual analysis of hospitality and tourism marketing research from 2000–2020

Measuring the academic reputation through citation networks via PageRank

A Longitudinal Analysis of University Rankings

The past, present, and future of measurement and methods in marketing analysis

Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK’s national research assessment exercise

Mapping the Research Fronts of Sustainable Marketing Management: A Bibliometric Review from 1988 to 2021: A Systematic Literature Review Using Analysis of Co-Citation and Co-Words