ENHANCE: Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Adjunctive Pimavanserin for Schizophrenia in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Antipsychotic Treatment

Dragana Bugarski-Kirola,Istvan Bitter,I-Yuan Liu,Brandon Abbs,Srdjan Stankovic
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac006
2022-01-01
Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
Abstract:Abstract Inadequate response to antipsychotic treatment is common in patients with schizophrenia. This study evaluated pimavanserin, a 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist/antagonist, as adjunctive treatment in patients with inadequate response. This was a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study conducted in North America and Europe. Adult outpatients with schizophrenia and inadequate response to current antipsychotic were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score ≥65 and ≤110 and retrospective antipsychotic treatment stability of 8 weeks. Pimavanserin 20 mg/day or placebo added to ongoing antipsychotic was tested in a flexible-dose paradigm with dose adjustments allowed during the first 3 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint, PANSS total score change from baseline to week 6, was not met, although improvement was greater with pimavanserin than placebo (LS mean difference: –2.1, [95% CI: –4.5, 0.4]; P = .094). As a hierarchical testing procedure was used, additional efficacy analyses were exploratory. Clear separation from placebo was observed with pimavanserin at week 6 for the PANSS Negative Symptoms subscale (LS mean difference: –0.7, [95% CI: –1.5, 0.0]) and Marder Negative Symptom Factor score (–0.9, [–1.7, –0.1]). Analysis of European sites (81.5% of patients) revealed a difference for pimavanserin versus placebo on PANSS total score (LS mean difference: –3.1, [95% CI: –5.8, –0.4]) and Clinical Global Impressions–Severity score (–0.2, [–0.4, –0.0]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 39.9% with pimavanserin and 36.4% with placebo. Although statistical significance for the primary endpoint was not met, a trend toward improvement in negative symptoms was observed with pimavanserin, warranting further study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?