Abstract:Bioclimatic variables are chief components of models targeting climate change effects on the potential distribution of species. Predicted distributions depend on the values of the bioclimatic variable (e.g., precipitation of the wettest quarter). At the same time, a shift in the period underlying the variable calculation (e.g., wettest quarter) easily remains hidden, even though the ecological meaning of these variables depends heavily on it. Our study uncovers how the within‐year position of these specific climate periods is expected to shift in a global context in reaction to climate change according to four future time periods, four scenarios, and four global climate models. Modeling how climate change may affect the potential distribution of species and communities typically utilizes bioclimatic variables. Distribution predictions rely on the values of the bioclimatic variable (e.g., precipitation of the wettest quarter). However, the ecological meaning of most of these variables depends strongly on the within‐year position of a specific climate period (SCP), for example, the wettest quarter of the year, which is often overlooked. Our aim was to determine how the within‐year position of the SCPs would shift (SCP shift) in reaction to climate change in a global context. We calculated the deviations of the future within‐year position of the SCPs relative to the reference period. We used four future time periods, four scenarios, and four CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) to provide an ensemble of expectations regarding SCP shifts and locate the spatial hotspots of the shifts. Also, the size and frequency of the SCP shifts were subjected to linear models to evaluate the importance of the impact modeler's decision on time period, scenario, and GCM. We found ample examples of SCP shifts exceeding 2 months, with 6‐month shifts being predicted as well. Many areas in the tropics are expected to experience both temperature and precipitation‐related shifts, but precipitation‐related shifts are abundantly predicted for the temperate and arctic zones as well. The combined shifts at the Equator reinforce the likelihood of the emergence of no‐analogue climates there. The shifts become more pronounced as time and scenario progress, while GCMs could not be ranked in a clear order in this respect. For most SCPs, the modeler's decision on the GCM was the least important, while the choice of time period was typically more important than the choice of scenario. Future predictive distribution models should account for SCP shifts and incorporate the phenomenon in the modeling efforts.

Comparison of a species distribution model and a process model from a hierarchical perspective to quantify effects of projected climate change on tree species

Biological mechanisms are necessary to improve projections of species range shifts

Model complexity affects species distribution projections under climate change

The Site-Scale Processes Affect Species Distribution Predictions of Forest Landscape Models

Quantifying Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity and Other Clustering Processes on Spatial Distributions of Tree Species

Thematic and Spatial Resolutions Affect Model-Based Predictions of Tree Species Distribution.

Effects of Environmental Heterogeneity on Predictions of Tree Species' Abundance in Response to Climate Warming

Measuring Impact of Climate Change on Tree Species: analysis of JSDM on FIA data

Precipitation and temperature timings underlying bioclimatic variables rearrange under climate change globally

Predictive ability of a process‐based versus a correlative species distribution model

A tree's view of the terrain: downscaling bioclimate variables to high resolution using a novel multi‐level species distribution model

A Test of Species Distribution Model Transferability Across Environmental and Geographic Space for 108 Western North American Tree Species

Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales

Spatially‐nested hierarchical species distribution models to overcome niche truncation in national‐scale studies

Individualistic vs community modelling of species distributions under climate change

Coarse climate change projections for species living in a fine‐scaled world

Nonlinear Mixed Effect Model Used in a Simulation of the Impact of Climate Change on Height Growth of Cyclobalanopsis glauca

A comparison of macroecological and stacked species distribution models to predict future global terrestrial vertebrate richness

Structural Uncertainty in Models Projecting the Consequences of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Biodiversity

Modeling plant ranges over 75 years of climate change in California, USA: temporal transferability and species traits

Comparing species distributions modelled from occurrence data and from expert-based range maps. Implication for predicting range shifts with climate change