Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in plants

Shucen Wan,Liwen Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-015-0842-1
2015-06-10
PROTOPLASMA
Abstract:Being a major factory for protein synthesis, assembly, and export, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) has a precise and robust ER quality control (ERQC) system monitoring its product line. However, when organisms are subjected to environmental stress, whether biotic or abiotic, the levels of misfolded proteins may overwhelm the ERQC system, tilting the balance between the capacity of and demand for ER quality control and resulting in a scenario termed ER stress. Intense or prolonged ER stress may cause damage to the ER as well as to other organelles, or even lead to cell death in extreme cases. To avoid such serious consequences, cells activate self-rescue programs to restore protein homeostasis in the ER, either through the enhancement of protein-folding and degradation competence or by alleviating the demands for such reactions. These are collectively called the unfolded protein response (UPR). Long investigated in mammalian cells and yeasts, the UPR is also of great interest to plant scientists. Among the three branches of UPR discovered in mammals, two have been studied in plants with plant homologs existing of the ER-membrane-associated activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1). This review discusses the molecular mechanisms of these two types of UPR in plants, as well as the consequences of insufficient UPR, with a focus on experiments using model plants.
cell biology,plant sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the molecular mechanisms of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and its unfolded protein response (UPR) in plant cells. Specifically, the article focuses on how, in plant cells, when facing environmental stresses (such as heat, cold, salt, drought, etc.), specific signaling pathways are activated to restore protein homeostasis and avoid cell damage or death. The paper specifically discusses two major UPR branches: the ATF6 homolog pathway and the IRE1 pathway, and analyzes the specific mechanisms of action and consequences of these pathways in response to ER stress. ### Core issues of the paper 1. **Definition and impact of ER stress**: The paper first introduces the concept of ER stress, that is, when plant cells are exposed to environmental stress, the number of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum exceeds the processing capacity of the ER quality control system (ERQC), resulting in ER stress. Long - term or severe ER stress may lead to organelle damage and even cell death. 2. **Molecular mechanisms of UPR**: The paper explores in detail the two main pathways of UPR in plant cells: - **ATF6 homolog pathway**: Through the release and transport of bZIP17/28 transcription factors on the ER membrane, and finally enter the nucleus, inducing the gene expression of ER - resident molecular chaperones and folding enzymes, enhancing protein - folding ability. - **IRE1 pathway**: Through the oligomerization of IRE1 protein and non - classical splicing of mRNA, an active bZIP60 transcription factor is generated, further up - regulating the expression of ERAD components and lipid - synthesis - related genes, accelerating the clearance of misfolded proteins and the expansion of ER. 3. **Differences and interactions of UPR pathways**: The paper compares the different characteristics of the ATF6 homolog pathway and the IRE1 pathway in the activation and attenuation processes, as well as their sensitivities under different types of ER stress. 4. **Consequences of insufficient UPR**: Even though there are multiple UPR pathways, in extreme cases, these pathways may not be able to fully restore ER homeostasis. At this time, plant cells may initiate autophagy or programmed cell death (PCD) to reduce the ER burden or clear damaged cells. ### Formulas and diagrams The molecular mechanisms and pathways involved in the paper can be supplemented by the following diagrams and formulas: #### Figure 1: Comparison between ERQC system and UPR ```markdown ![ERQC system and UPR comparison](URL://not_translated) ``` #### Figure 2: Arabidopsis bZIP17/28 signaling pathway ```markdown ![Arabidopsis bZIP17/28 signaling pathway](URL://not_translated) ``` #### Figure 3: AtIRE1 signaling pathway ```markdown ![AtIRE1 signaling pathway](URL://not_translated) ``` #### Figure 4: IRE1 - RIDD pathway ```markdown ![IRE1 - RIDD pathway](URL://not_translated) ``` #### Figure 5: Gene structures of AtbZIP17/28 and AtIRE1 ```markdown ![Gene structures of AtbZIP17/28 and AtIRE1](URL://not_translated) ``` ### Conclusion This paper reveals how plants restore protein homeostasis through specific signaling pathways to avoid cell damage when facing environmental stress by analyzing in detail the molecular mechanisms of ER stress and UPR in plant cells. This is of great significance for understanding the stress - resistance mechanisms of plants and also provides a theoretical basis for future research.