Abstract:Copy number variations (CNVs) are gain and loss of DNA sequence of a genome. High throughput platforms such as microarrays and next generation sequencing technologies (NGS) have been applied for genome wide copy number losses. Although progress has been made in both approaches, the accuracy and consistency of CNV calling from the two platforms remain in dispute. In this study, we perform a deep analysis on copy number losses on 254 human DNA samples, which have both SNP microarray data and NGS data publicly available from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project respectively. We show that the copy number losses reported from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genome Project only have < 30% overlap, while these reports are required to have cross-platform (e.g. PCR, microarray and high-throughput sequencing) experimental supporting by their corresponding projects, even though state-of-art calling methods were employed. On the other hand, copy number losses are found directly from HapMap microarray data by an accurate algorithm, i.e. CNVhac, almost all of which have lower read mapping depth in NGS data; furthermore, 88% of which can be supported by the sequences with breakpoint in NGS data. Our results suggest the ability of microarray calling CNVs and the possible introduction of false negatives from the unessential requirement of the additional cross-platform supporting. The inconsistency of CNV reports from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project might result from the inadequate information containing in microarray data, the inconsistent detection criteria, or the filtration effect of cross-platform supporting. The statistical test on CNVs called from CNVhac show that the microarray data can offer reliable CNV reports, and majority of CNV candidates can be confirmed by raw sequences. Therefore, the CNV candidates given by a good caller could be highly reliable without cross-platform supporting, so additional experimental information should be applied in need instead of necessarily.

Quantitative assessment of single-cell whole genome amplification methods for detecting copy number variation using hippocampal neurons

Quantitative comparison of single-cell sequencing methods using hippocampal neurons

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

Accurate and Sensitive Single-Cell-level Detection of Copy Number Variations by Micro-Channel Multiple Displacement Amplification (Μcmda).

A Single Cell Level Based Method For Copy Number Variation Analysis By Low Coverage Massively Parallel Sequencing

A Quantitative Comparison of Single-Cell Whole Genome Amplification Methods

Genome-Wide Detection of Single-Nucleotide and Copy-Number Variations of a Single Human Cell

SCCNV: A Software Tool for Identifying Copy Number Variation From Single-Cell Whole-Genome Sequencing

An Empirical Algorithm for Bias Correction Based on GC Estimation for Single Cell Sequencing.

Comparative study of whole genome amplification and next generation sequencing performance of single cancer cells

Single-Cell Whole-Genome Amplification and Sequencing: Methodology and Applications

Single-cell somatic copy number variants in brain using different amplification methods and reference genomes

Accurate CNV identification from only a few cells with low GC bias in a single-molecule sequencing platform

Single-Cell-Based Platform for Copy Number Variation Profiling Through Digital Counting of Amplified Genomic DNA Fragments

High-resolution detection of copy number alterations in single cells with HiScanner

Genome-wide copy number analysis of single cells

Comparison of Variations Detection Between Whole-Genome Amplification Methods Used in Single-Cell Resequencing

BIC-seq: a Fast Algorithm for Detection of Copy Number Alterations Based on High-Throughput Sequencing Data

Copy Number Variation Detection In Whole-Genome Sequencing Data Using The Bayesian Information Criterion

Abstract 5400: Accurate identification of single nucleotide variants in whole genome amplified single cells

A Remark on Copy Number Variation Detection Methods