An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies

Michael J. Waring,John Arrowsmith,Andrew R. Leach,Paul D. Leeson,Sam Mandrell,Robert M. Owen,Garry Pairaudeau,William D. Pennie,Stephen D. Pickett,Jibo Wang,Owen Wallace,Alex Weir
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4609
IF: 112.288
2015-06-19
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Abstract:Key PointsThis Analysis article describes the compilation and analysis of combined data on the attrition of drug candidates from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer.The analysis reaffirms that control of physicochemical properties during compound optimization is beneficial in identifying compounds of candidate drug quality.Safety and toxicology are the largest sources of failure within the data set.The link between calculated physicochemical properties and frequent causes of attrition (preclinical toxicology, clinical safety and human pharmacokinetics) is assessed.Analysis of this data set shows that none of the physicochemical descriptors we examined correlates with preclinical toxicology outcomes.This work is the first to indicate a link between lipophilicity and clinical failure owing to safety issues. The utility of this finding in a prospective sense is discussed.Although control of physicochemical properties is clearly important, this analysis suggests that further stringency in this respect is unlikely to have a significant effect on attrition in development and that additional work is required to address safety-related failures.
pharmacology & pharmacy,biotechnology & applied microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?