Abstract:The opposition between transcendentalism and naturalism plays a key role in discussions about consciousness at the confluence of phenomenology and analytical philosophy. Associated with it is a whole range of research programs. However, the opposition between transcendentalism and naturalism in these programs is, as a rule, operational and not thematic in nature and presupposes that 1) Transcendentalism and naturalism as traditions are initially alien to each other; 2) The domain of their opposition is ontology. The article attempts to problematize these premises based on one historical circumstance. Turning to the texts of Kant, the founder of transcendental philosophy, I intend to show that transcendentalism, which was first substantiated in them, is a version of naturalistic ontology, that is, a peculiarly interpreted naturalism that identifies nature with its natural scientific model and excludes constituting subjectivity from ontology. It is built not on the naturalization of phenomenology, but on the transcendentalization of natural science. Reinterpreting the experimental method in the spirit of the Copernican turn, Kant substantiates the apodictic nature and lack of alternative to the ontology of nature by turning nature into a correlate of consciousness and strictly limiting the principles of mathematical natural science to the boundaries of the phenomenal world. As a result, the true theme of philosophy—the thing in itself and transcendental subjectivity itself—is taken beyond the boundaries of ontology. The thematization of the naturalistic origins of transcendentalism and the removal of transcendental consciousness beyond the boundaries of ontology, carried out within its framework, thus reveals the problematic nature of these premises. The article also demonstrates that, despite significant differences in the understanding of transcendental philosophy and ontology between Kant and Husserl, the identified motives—the naturalistic nature of the ontological foundation and the meta-ontological character of transcendental subjectivity—remain of fundamental importance for the founder of phenomenology. This allows us to conclude that ontology is not the original domain of confrontation between transcendentalism and naturalism and to substantiate the compatibilist thesis according to which transcendentalism is compatible with ontological naturalism.

The Tantalus’ Torments of Transcendentalism

Kant’s Philosophy of Pure Reason as a Speculative Foresight of Cosmism, Virtualization and Artificial Intelligence (Transcendental Digitalism Contra Telluric Realism)

Research on Kant's Opus postumum : Literature and dymatic

Kant’s Concept of Space and Time in the Light of Modern Science

How Kant Transcends the Mechanical View of Nature

TRANSCENDENTALISM, NATURALISM AND ONTOLOGY

On Kant's Constitution for Scientific Natural Metaphysics In Critique of Pure Reason

Anthropologia transscendentalis. Kant's theory of human nature

From "Metaphysics" to "Practical Metaphysics":On the Substance of Kant's Copernican Revolution in Philosophy

International Research of Kant’s Philosophy of Science:Status,Horizons and Contemporary Significance

A Dilemma and Inspiration of Kant's View on the Time

Between Old and New Teleology. Kant on Maupertuis’ Principle of Least Action

Toward a new transcendental aesthetic: Merleau-Ponty’s appraisal of Kant’s philosophical method

Kantian and Neo-Kantian First Principles for Physical and Metaphysical Cognition

Discrimination on Transzendental and Transzendent in Kant's philosophy

Kant and Hegel in Physics

Metaphysics, Man and Nature——Heidegger and Kant's Transcendental Imagination

On the Metaphysical Foundation of Kant's Doctrine of Right

A Philosophical Theory of Science

Cosmological Black Hole Observations and Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic

Kant's Significance:the Interpretation and the New Route of Modern Empiricism