Investigating Bayesian optimization for expensive-to-evaluate black box functions: Application in fluid dynamics
Mike Diessner,Joseph O'Connor,Andrew Wynn,Sylvain Laizet,Yu Guan,Kevin Wilson,Richard D. Whalley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2022.1076296
2022-07-19
Abstract:Bayesian optimization provides an effective method to optimize
expensive-to-evaluate black box functions. It has been widely applied to
problems in many fields, including notably in computer science, e.g. in machine
learning to optimize hyperparameters of neural networks, and in engineering,
e.g. in fluid dynamics to optimize control strategies that maximize drag
reduction. This paper empirically studies and compares the performance and the
robustness of common Bayesian optimization algorithms on a range of synthetic
test functions to provide general guidance on the design of Bayesian
optimization algorithms for specific problems. It investigates the choice of
acquisition function, the effect of different numbers of training samples, the
exact and Monte Carlo based calculation of acquisition functions, and both
single-point and multi-point optimization. The test functions considered cover
a wide selection of challenges and therefore serve as an ideal test bed to
understand the performance of Bayesian optimization to specific challenges, and
in general. To illustrate how these findings can be used to inform a Bayesian
optimization setup tailored to a specific problem, two simulations in the area
of computational fluid dynamics are optimized, giving evidence that suitable
solutions can be found in a small number of evaluations of the objective
function for complex, real problems. The results of our investigation can
similarly be applied to other areas, such as machine learning and physical
experiments, where objective functions are expensive to evaluate and their
mathematical expressions are unknown.
Machine Learning