Abstract:Background: Endovascular therapy is one of the standard treatment options for patients with peripheral arterial disease. Paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) have shown promising results in the treatment of obstructive femoropopliteal lesions. Two types of PES, namely, Zilver PTX (Cook Medical, USA) and Eluvia (Boston Scientific, USA), are available worldwide. However, no study has yet compared the outcomes of applying both PES types in the real world. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the one-year outcomes of two different types of PES for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document (TASC) C/D obstructive femoropopliteal lesions following suboptimal angioplasty. Patients and Methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational study examined 37 limbs of 34 patients (30 males and four females) with the mean age of 71.9 ± 9.1 years (range, 53-90 years), who were included consecutively from February 2017 to May 2018. In all patients, either a Zilver PTX (Cook Medical) or an Eluvia (Boston Scientific) PES was used for TASC C/D obstructive femoropopliteal lesions following suboptimal angioplasty. Moreover, the patients’ one-year primary patency rate, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), and event-free survival rates were determined. Results: The mean lesion length was measured to be 24.6 ± 6.6 cm (range, 9 - 46 cm). Based on the results, 78% of the lesions (29 limbs) showed occlusion, and 46% (17 limbs) showed more than moderate calcification. According to the TASC classification, type D lesions were detected in 25 (68%) limbs, while type C lesions were detected in 12 (32%) limbs. The mean number of stents used was 2.5 ± 0.7 per limb (range, 1 - 3) to cover a mean length of 24.3 ± 7.9 cm (range, 6-35 cm). Overall, 56 Zilver PTX stents for 23 limbs and 36 Eluvia stents for 14 limbs were used. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of one-year primary patency and freedom from TLR were 78% and 88%, respectively (Zilver PTX stent, 76.3% and 81.2%, respectively; Eluvia stent, 91.7% and 100%, respectively). Major adverse events were reported in two patients (2/37, 5.4%), including acute thrombotic occlusion of the treated lesions. Conclusion: Both types of PES showed promising one-year outcomes for TASC C/D lesions regarding safety and efficacy, without any significant differences; therefore, they can be considered as an alternative therapeutic approach for surgery.

Serial changes of coronary endothelial function and arterial healing after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials on Clinical Outcomes of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Effects of Paclitaxel-eluting Stent on Blood Vessel Endothelial Function

Safety and efficacy of polymer-free paclitaxel-eluting microporous stent in real-world practice: 1-year follow-up of the SERY-I registry.

Different edge effects of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents on proximal and distal edges in patients with unstable angina: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis.

Clinical outcome following aleatory implantation of paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents in complex coronary lesions.

Long-Term Effects of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents on Patients with Acute St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Outcomes of 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up

One-Year Outcomes of Two Different Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents (Zilver PTX and Eluvia) for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document (TASC) C/D Obstructive Femoropopliteal Lesions

Clinical outcomes and predictors of restenosis in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease treated using polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents or drug-coated balloons

Temporal Changes in Circulating P-selectin, Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1, Magnesium, and Creatine Kinase after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Two-year results and subgroup analyses of the PEPCAD China in-stent restenosis trial: A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis.

Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy of the Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus the Bare-Metal Stent for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

One-Year Late Lumen Loss between A Polymer-Coated Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent (Eluvia) and a Polymer-Free Paclitaxel-Coated Stent (Zilver PTX) for Femoropopliteal Disease

Paclitaxel exposure and long-term mortality of patients treated with the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent

Evaluation of a Novel Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent with a Bioabsorbable Polymeric Surface Coating in the Porcine Artery Injury Model

Plaque erosion delays vascular healing after drug eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: An In Vivo Optical Coherence Tomography Study

Safety and Efficacy of a Non-Polymeric Paclitaxel-Eluting Microporous Stent in Real-World Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Two-year clinical outcomes and predictors of restenosis following the use of polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents or drug-coated balloons in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease

Pathological evaluation of predictors for delayed endothelial coverage after currently available drug-eluting stent implantation in coronary arteries: Impact of lesions with acute and chronic coronary syndromes

Comparison of paclitaxal vs. sirolimus eluting stents with bio-degradable polymer for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: subgroup analysis from DKCRUSH-I and DKCRUSH-II studies.

Healed neointima of in-stent restenosis lesions in patients with stable angina pectoris: an intracoronary optical coherence tomography study