Early diagnosis of bladder cancer through the detection of urinary tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins

A Khadjavi,F Mannu,P Destefanis,C Sacerdote,A Battaglia,M Allasia,D Fontana,B Frea,S Polidoro,G Fiorito,G Matullo,A Pantaleo,A Notarpietro,M Prato,F Castagno,P Vineis,P Gontero,G Giribaldi,F Turrini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.232
IF: 9.075
2015-06-30
British Journal of Cancer
Abstract:Background:A noninvasive, highly sensitive and specific urine test is needed for bladder cancer (BC) diagnosis and surveillance in addition to the invasive cystoscopy. We previously described the diagnostic effectiveness of urinary tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins (UPY) and a new assay (UPY-A) for their measurement in a pilot study. The aim of this work was to evaluate the performances of the UPY-A using an independent cohort of 262 subjects.Methods:Urinary tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were measured by UPY-A test. The area under ROC curve, cutoff, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of UPY-A were determined. The association of UPY levels with tumour staging, grading, recurrence and progression risk was analysed by Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon’s test. To test the probability to be a case if positive at the UPY-A, a logistic test adjusted for possible confounding factor was used.Results:Results showed a significant difference of UPY levels between patients with BC vs healthy controls. For the best cutoff value, 261.26 Standard Units (SU), the sensitivity of the assay was 80.43% and the specificity was 78.82%. A statistically significant difference was found in the levels of UPY at different BC stages and grades between Ta and T1 and with different risk of recurrence and progression. A statistically significant increased risk for BC at UPY-A ⩾261.26 SU was observed.Conclusions:The present study supplies important information on the diagnostic characteristics of UPY-A revealing remarkable performances for early stages and allowing its potential use for different applications encompassing the screening of high-risk subjects, primary diagnosis and posttreatment surveillance.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?