Abstract:AlphaFold2 (AF2) and RoseTTaFold (RF) have revolutionized structural biology, serving as highly reliable and effective methods for predicting protein structures. This article explores their impact and limitations, focusing on their integration into experimental pipelines and their application in diverse protein classes, including membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and oligomers. In experimental pipelines, AF2 models help X-ray crystallography in resolving the phase problem, while complementarity with mass spectrometry and NMR data enhances structure determination and protein flexibility prediction. Predicting the structure of membrane proteins remains challenging for both AF2 and RF due to difficulties in capturing conformational ensembles and interactions with the membrane. Improvements in incorporating membrane-specific features and predicting the structural effect of mutations are crucial. For intrinsically disordered proteins, AF2's confidence score (pLDDT) serves as a competitive disorder predictor, but integrative approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations or hydrophobic cluster analyses are advocated for accurate dynamics representation. AF2 and RF show promising results for oligomeric models, outperforming traditional docking methods, with AlphaFold-Multimer showing improved performance. However, some caveats remain in particular for membrane proteins. Real-life examples demonstrate AF2's predictive capabilities in unknown protein structures, but models should be evaluated for their agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, AF2 models can be used complementarily with MD simulations. In this Perspective, we propose a "wish list" for improving deep-learning-based protein folding prediction models, including using experimental data as constraints and modifying models with binding partners or post-translational modifications. Additionally, a meta-tool for ranking and suggesting composite models is suggested, driving future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

A paradigm shift in structural biology

Will Cryo-Electron Microscopy Shift the Current Paradigm in Protein Structure Prediction?

An outlook on structural biology after AlphaFold: tools, limits and perspectives

Structural biology is solved — now what?

Structural Biology Meets Biomolecular Networks: The Post-AlphaFold Era

Predictive modeling and cryo-EM: A synergistic approach to modeling macromolecular structure

Broadening environmental research in the era of accurate protein structure determination and predictions

Advances in protein structure prediction and design

From sequence to mechanobiology? Promises and challenges for AlphaFold 3

AlphaFold-latest: revolutionizing protein structure prediction for comprehensive biomolecular insights and therapeutic advancements

Protein Structure Prediction: Challenges, Advances, and the Shift of Research Paradigms

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

AI told you so: navigating protein structure prediction in the era of machine learning

Protein structure prediction has reached the single-structure frontier

Protein structure predictions to atomic accuracy with AlphaFold

Protein Structure Prediction until CASP15

Good reasons for structural biology

A glance into the evolution of template-free protein structure prediction methodologies

Structure Prediction and Computational Protein Design for Efficient Biocatalysts and Bioactive Proteins

Progress On Modeling Of Protein Structures And Interactions