Abstract:The purpose of computer assistance in a total knee replacement is to achieve optimal alignment, size, and positioning of the implant. The method is safe and accurate and may be particularly useful in cases with abnormal anatomy. Description: The classical computer-assisted system for total knee replacement was developed with real-time surgical navigation using infrared optical tracking arrays. The tracking arrays are attached to the tibial and femoral shafts, as well as to surgical tools, allowing the surgeon to move the tools relative to the knee. The computer-assisted systems allow the surgeon to combine the "measured resection" and "gap balancing" techniques.Step 1: Preoperative planning. Set up the computer and software with the manufacturer implant features and personal preferences.Step 2: Positioning and surgical exposure. Position the patient in order to optimize the camera view.Step 3: Fixation of marker pins. Fix the marker pins to the tibial and femoral shafts.Step 4: Registration of anatomical landmarks and mechanical axes. Move the limb and mark out the anatomical landmarks according to the instructions given by the computer.Step 5: Adaption to the best model. Continue to register the joint surface and anatomy to adapt the fittest pre-registered model to the knee.Step 6: Fine-tuning. The femoral and tibial components are adjusted in size, flexion, extension, rotation, slope, and positioning along the anterior-posterior axis.Step 7: Navigation of cutting blocks and ligament balancing. The cutting blocks are positioned with the assistance of computerized navigation, adjusting for the mechanical axis and ligament tension. The cuts are then performed. Implant trials are inserted, and remaining soft-tissue releases may be performed assisted by the computer. Final implantation is performed. Alternatives: Conventional knee replacement using intramedullary rods as guidance. Rationale: The alignment and positioning of the implant are improved with the use of computer navigation1-5. Abnormal anatomy, anatomical variants and deformities, and presence of previous fractures are easy to manage with the precise assistance from the computer. Thus, in many cases, computer assistance may be a useful tool. Expected outcomes: Computer-assisted navigation may optimize the precision and accuracy of the surgical procedure. Given the correct target, the outcome of total knee replacement may be more predictable with use of this tool; however, the impact on functional outcomes has not yet been proven to be clinically relevant in clinical trials, and the implant longevity has not been improved6-11. Important tips: Use two 3-mm drill pins for fixation of the optical array to the tibia and femur.If pins are placed within the wound (not through separate stab incisions), plan the positioning relative to the implant to avoid obstruction of the trials.In severely osteoporotic patients, use bicortical fixation and handle the tissues and limb gently to avoid bumping or displacing the optical array as this will negatively alter the registration and reduce navigational accuracy.Make sure the reflective beads on the optical array are clean at all times and remove them (if using clip-on beads) when using the saw to avoid blood splatter.Train an assistant to press the screen buttons in the correct order and in accordance with the surgical progress.

Employing Conventional Instrumentation with Computer-Aided Surgery in Total Knee Replacement — Making it Simple

Computer-Assisted Surgery in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Our Experience

Early Assessment of the Likely Cost-Effectiveness of a New Technology: A Markov Model with Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis of Computer-Assisted Total Knee Replacement

Computer- and Robot-Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Analysis of a New Surgical Procedure

A Novel Technique for Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Computer-Assisted Devices

After 25 years of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, where do we stand today?

Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Advantages of patient-specific cutting guides with disposable instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a case control study

Computerized Navigation: A Useful Tool in Total Knee Replacement

The application of computer-assisted surgery in the teaching and training of total knee arthroplasty

The current role of CT in total knee arthroplasty

[Effect of the Surgical Time and Coronalmechanical Alignment after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer Navigation System, Traditionalor 3D Printing Patient-Specific Instruments].

Simultaneous Evaluation of Bone Cut and Implant Placement Accuracy in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Lower Perioperative Complication Rates and Shorter Lengths of Hospital Stay Associated With Technology-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Conventional Instrumentation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Handheld computer-navigated constrained total knee arthroplasty for complex extra-articular deformities

Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Shorter Navigation Working Time With Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared to Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Updated Software

New technology: Custom made implants, patient-specific alignment, and navigation - How to convince my hospital it's worth it: Current concepts

Conventionally instrumented inverse kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty: How is it done?

Imageless robotic handpiece-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a learning curve analysis of surgical time and alignment accuracy

Active Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): Initial Experience with the TSolution One ® TKA System