Abstract:ABSTRACT Introduction Low/no sexual desire/frequency or sexual desire discrepancies are one of the most common presenting problems in sex therapists’ offices and among the hardest to treat. Most interventions target the identified patient (i.e., typically the woman with low desire), most recently via biomedical therapies (i.e., flibanserin and bremelanotide). Few interventions to date have shown consistent and successful improvements in this population of distressed couples. Objective To determine whether a group couples sex therapy intervention, offered in-person or via teletherapy, could help couples distressed by low/no sexual desire/frequency. Methods Couples were seen in groups of 4-6 couples (i.e,. 8-12 individuals) for an 8-week, 16-hour intervention led by 13 co-therapist dyads (i.e., 26 licensed clinicians) in 2 countries. Individuals completed the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale (NSSS) plus 3 additional items at assessment, pre-test, post-test and at 6-month follow-up. A total of 107 couples (i.e., 214 individuals) completed the intervention from pre-test to post-test, 75 of whom completed the intervention in-person and 32 via teletherapy during COVID-19. This included 94 heterosexual couples and 13 LGBTQ couples. Of these 107 couples, 42 (i.e., the waitlist control) also completed the assessment at least one month prior to group therapy and 51 couples completed the 6-month follow-up. Paired samples t-tests were conducted between assessment and pre-test, between pre-test and post-test and between pre-test and follow-up. Paired samples t-tests were also conducted between couples’ mean scores on individual items from pre-test to post-test and from pre-test to follow-up. An independent samples t-test was conducted on the mean differences in outcomes between couples who completed the in-person intervention versus those who completed it via teletherapy. Participants also provided written feedback regarding changes in their relationships resulting from therapy. Results No changes occurred on waitlist control scores from assessment to pre-test. For all couples, mean total scores on the NSSS increased by an average of 13.1 ± 10.7 points from pre-test to post-test. This increase in scores was equally significant for groups conducted in-person (p < .001, d = 1.2), and via teletherapy (p < .001, d = 1.3). The amount of change found in couples who underwent the in-person intervention versus those who participated in online group therapy was equivalent. There was a statistically significant increase in scores between pre-test and 6-month follow-up (p < .001, d = 0.6), suggesting that the effects of the intervention were enduring. In addition, there was a statistically significant difference from pre-test to post-test for various individual items on the NSSS, most notably in satisfaction with individuals’ overall sex lives (p < .001, d = 0.9). In their feedback, participants described improvements in emotional connection, embodiment, being “in the moment”, playfulness, enjoyment, authenticity, as well as increased comfort with communication in general, about sex and at times of conflict. Conclusions Group couples therapy for low/no sexual desire/frequency, offered in person or via teletherapy, is an accessible and effective way of enhancing sexual intimacy and thereby ameliorating sexual desire discrepancies for distressed couples. Disclosure Work supported by industry: no.

Differential effectiveness of group, individual, and conjoint treatments: An archival analysis of OQ-45 change trajectories

Preliminary evidence on the effectiveness of psychological treatments delivered at a university counseling center.

A Nonrandomized Effectiveness Comparison of Broad-Spectrum Group CBT to Individual CBT for Depressed Outpatients in a Community Mental Health Setting

Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of different ACT delivery formats to treat depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

What works better? 1-year outcomes of an effectiveness trial comparing online, telehealth, and group-based formats of a military parenting program.

Dose-effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: The good enough level.

Variability in treatment effects in an English national dataset of psychological therapies: The relationships between severity, treatment duration, and therapy type

The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 feedback system in Norway: A multisite randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting

Qualitative Treatment-Subgroup Interactions in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Treatments for Adolescents with ADHD: Exploring What Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Works for Whom

Test of the phase model of psychotherapy in a training clinic.

Comparing an In-Person and Online Continuing Education Intervention to Improve Professional Decision-Making: A Mixed Methods Study

Trajectories of changes in distress in counseling center clients: a replication study

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes

Experimental Variation of Relationship Styles Draft Version Preprint

Learning Outcomes that Maximally Differentiate Psychiatric Treatments

The effectiveness of in-person versus remote group couples therapy for the treatment of low sexual desire or frequency

Investigating Determinants of Client Psychotherapy Preference: An Analog Study

Changes in harm avoidance and incompleteness across group CBT for OCD and their relationship with symptom change

Examining Profiles and Treatment Outcomes in Dual Diagnosis: Comparison of Coordinated Treatment With Mental Health Services Versus Addiction Center Alone: A Real-World Data Analysis

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Modalities of Group Delivery of Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) Intervention for Food Cravings: Online versus In-Person

Group Discussion [Methods for assesment of change (A)].