Abstract:Introduction. In Russia, there is no framework law regulating the extrajudicial administrative process. This circumstance makes it necessary to define doctrinally the principles of resolving administrative cases before drafting the law on administrative procedures. The article attempts to develop and propose to the legislator non-declarative principles of extra-judicial administrative proceedings that could actually be applied in the practice of considering specific administrative cases. Both domestic and foreign scientific experience and administrative procedural legislation are taken into account. Theoretical Basis. Methods. The theoretical basis of the work is the concept of an integrative understanding of the administrative process. System, logical, formal-legal and comparative research methods were used. Results. The Russian legislation does not contain universal principles for the implementation of non-judicial administrative proceedings. The principles provided for by individual laws are general legal in nature and are not procedural. Such principles do not reflect the basic principles of the relationship between public and private persons in administrative cases. Historically, Soviet and post-Soviet approaches have focused on declaring the general legal basis of the administrative process and are not aimed at fixing the applied procedural principles of administrative proceedings in the legislation. In foreign countries, the instrumental principles of extrajudicial resolution of administrative cases are applied in practice. The main attention is paid to the standards of relations between public administration and private individuals. Administrative and procedural laws of post-Soviet states mostly duplicate the principles developed in western countries Discussion and Conclusion. The authors come to the conclusion that it is necessary to distinguish three groups of principles in Russian legislation, among which are: general procedural principles; general principles of extrajudicial administrative process; and special principles of administrative proceedings.

The Rulemaking Procedure – Definition, Concepts and Public Participation

Procedural Law Regulation: The Problem of Efficiency

Administering Public Participation

On Construction of the System of Public Participation in Administrative Legislation

Public Participation in the Law-Making Process in Indonesia

The Issue of Interpretation Priority. Law as System of Principles and Rules

The concept of participation. If they have access and interact, do they really participate?

Technique and practice of international rule-making: review of the materials of the ESIL International conference

From experiments to ecosystems? Reviewing public participation, scientific governance and the systemic turn

The split ladder of participation: A literature review and dynamic path forward

From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019)

Citizen Participation in Public Administration

Significance of the Procedural Rules in Modern Antitrust Law

Procedural policy tools in theory and practice

Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance

Mediation: Rulemaking and Practice

An Elementary Approach to the Rule of Law

Decision-making and ecosystem-based management: Applying the Vroom-Yetton model to public participation strategy

Parliamentary Debates and Freedom of Speech of MPs as Defined in the Rules of Procedure of the 19th Century Croatian Parliament and Other Parliaments

Politicising the landscape: a theoretical contribution towards the development of participation in landscape planning

Principles of Modern Non-Judicial Administrative Process (Administrative Proceedings): Problems of Understanding and Systematization