Extensive ethnolinguistic diversity at the crossroads of North China and South Siberia reflects multiple sources of genetic diversity

Guang‐Lin He,Meng‐Ge Wang,Xing Zou,Hui‐Yuan Yeh,Chang‐Hui Liu,Chao Liu,Gang Chen,Chuan‐Chao Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12827
2022-03-08
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
Abstract:North China and South Siberia, populated by Altaic‐ and Sino‐Tibetan‐speaking populations, possess extensive ethnolinguistic diversity and serve as the crossroads for the initial peopling of America and western–eastern transcontinental communication. However, the population genetic structure and admixture history of northern East Asians remain poorly understood due to a lack of genome‐wide data, especially for Mongolic‐speaking people in China. We genotyped genome‐wide single nucleotide polymorphisms for 510 individuals from 38 Mongolic, Tungusic, and Sinitic‐speaking populations. We first explored the shared alleles and haplotypes within the studied groups. We then merged with 3508 published modern and ancient Eurasian individuals to reconstruct the deep evolutionary and natural selection history of northern East Asians. We identified genetic substructures within Altaic‐speaking populations: Western Turkic people harbored more western Eurasian‐related ancestry; Northern Mongolic people in Siberia and eastern Tungusic people in Amur River Basin (ARB) possessed a majority of Neolithic ARB related ancestry; Southern Mongolic people in China possessed apparent genetic influence from Neolithic Yellow River Basin (YRB) farmers. Additionally, we found the differentiated admixture history between western and eastern Mongolians and geographically close Northeast Hans: the former received a genetic impact from western Eurasians, and the latter retained the primary Neolithic YRB and ARB ancestry. Moreover, we demonstrated that Kalmyk people from the northern Caucasus Mountains possessed a strong genetic affinity with Neolithic Mongolian Plateau (MP) people, supporting the hypothesis of their eastern Eurasian origin and long‐distance migration history. We also illuminated that historical pastoral empires in the MP contributed considerably to the gene pool of northern Mongolic people but rarely to the southern ones. We finally found natural selection signatures in Mongolians associated with alcohol metabolism. Our results demonstrated that the Neolithic ancestral sources from the MP or ARB played an important role in spreading Altaic populations and languages. The observed multisources of genetic diversity contributed significantly to the extensive ethnolinguistic diversity in northern East Asia. North China and South Siberia, populated by Altaic‐ and Sino‐Tibetan‐speaking populations, possess extensive ethnolinguistic diversity and serve as the crossroad for the initial peopling of America and western–eastern transcontinental communication. Yet, the complex scenarios of genetic origin, population structure, and admixture history of North‐East Asian remain to be fully characterized, especially for Mongolic people in China with a genome‐wide perspective. Therefore, we genotyped genome‐wide single nucleotide polymorphisms for 510 individuals from 38 Chinese Mongolic, Tungusic, and Sinitic populations to explore the shared alleles and haplotypes within the studied groups and then merged it with 3508 modern and ancient Eurasian individuals to reconstruct the deep evolutionary and natural selection history of northern East Asians. We identified significant substructures within Altaic‐speaking populations with the primary common ancestry linked to the Neolithic Northeast Asians: Western Turkic people harbored more western Eurasian ancestry; Northern Mongolic people in Siberia and eastern Tungusic people in Amur River Basin (ARB) possessed primary Neolithic Mongolian Plateau (MP) or ARB ancestry; Southern Mongolic people in China possessed obvious genetic influences from Neolithic Yellow River Basin (YRB) farmers. Additionally, we found the differentiated admixture history between western and eastern Mongolians and geographically close Northeast Hans: the former received a genetic impact from western Eurasians and the latter retained the primary YRB and ARB Neolithic ancestry. Moreover, we demonstrated that Kalmyk people from the northern Caucasus Mountains possessed a strong genetic affinity with Neolithic MP people, supporting the hypothesis of their eastern Eurasian origin and long‐distance migration history. We also illuminated that historical pastoral empires in the MP contributed considerably to the gene pool of northern Mongolic people but rarely to the southern ones. We finally found natural selection signatures in Mongolians associated with alcohol metabolism. Generally, our results not only illuminated that complex population migration and admixture of Neolithic ancestral sources from the MP or ARB played an important role in the spread of Altaic‐speaking populations and the Proto‐Altaic language but also demonstrated that the observed multisources of genetic diversity contributed significantly to the modern existing extensive ethnolinguistic diversity in North‐East Asia.
plant sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?