Abstract:The purpose of this study was to examine the potential interdependent relationships between religiosity, conservatism, social value orientation and philanthropy. Participants included members of four religious institutions. A non-experimental survey design was used gather information. Subjects were given a hypothetical task related to social value orientation, two scales of measurement related to religiosity and philanthropy and asked to self-identifr their political orientation. Chi Square analysis identified a significant relationship between political orientation and social value orientation. A correlation was found between religiosity and philanthropy within the liberal sample, rather than in the suspected conservative sample. Additionally, a one-way analysis of variance revealed that there were no significant differences in attitudes towards philanthropy. Results provide support for models suggesting that religion promotes competing psychological stances: conservatism and a prosocial value orientation. The Pew Research Center (2012) recently reported that America's politics fall along partisan lines and are more polarized than at any other time in the previous 25 years. This sentiment is often alluded to in today's media, and the 2012 Presidential election evidenced this as well. Each candidate emphasized that the 2012 election was about the fundamentally different paths on which America could be lead. A primary way that the policies of conservatives and liberals differ is the degree to which they facilitate government intervention in socioeconomic matters. Generally, the conservative base supports policies that stress minimal intervention. What is striking about this is that a core component of the conservative base is largely religious. While religious institutions typically promote prosocial attitudes and action, such as helping the poor, conservative economics reduce the amount of spending on social welfare programs. It seems that in regard to helping those of a lower socioeconomic class, political conservatism violates one of the primary tenets of most churches, yet many religious individuals continue to identify with conservative ideology (Guth, Kellstedt, Smidt, & Green, 2006; Kelly & Morgan, 2008; Layman & Carmines, 1997). This apparent contradiction was addressed extensively in a study conducted by Malka, Soto, Cohen, & Miller (2011). Their research was based on the hypothesis that religion has competing psychological influences on social welfare attitudes, and findings suggested that religiosity was a predictor for both opposition and approval of social welfare programs. It was argued that there are two pathways by which an individual can be influenced: one stressing conservatism, the other stressing prosocial values. Although specific determinants leading an individual to either pathway were not identified, the conservative pathway can be understood by recognizing that many politically conservative messages are those that are supported by the church. For instance, stances on sexuality, abortion and traditional families are topics that are central to each institution's identity. In relation to these stances, opposition to social welfare was hypothesized to be connected to one's need to be consistent in his or her world views. Malka et al. (2011) state that when a religious individual's views are aligned with the conservative end of politics, he may, in turn, "drag" his view of social welfare toward the conservative side so that his

Same-Sex Adoption as a Welfare Alternative? Conservatism, Neoliberal Values, and Support for Adoption by Same-Sex Couples

The Perceptions of New Zealand Lawyers and Social Workers About Children Being Adopted by Gay Couples and Lesbian Couples

Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Parents: Examining the Antecedents of Parenting Ability Evaluation

From leave it to beaver to modern family: The influence of family structure on adoption attitudes

A study of religiosity and conservatismin relation to social value orientation and philanthropy

Stronger color evasive racial ideologies predict lower likelihood of open adoption placement with same-sex couples

Does parental sexual orientation matter? A longitudinal follow-up of adoptive families with school-age children.

From Family Values to Religious Freedom: Conservative Discourse and the Politics of Gay Rights

Marriage and Family: LGBT Individuals and Same-Sex Couples

Stigma Experiences, Mental Health, Perceived Parenting Competence, and Parent–Child Relationships Among Lesbian, Gay, and Heterosexual Adoptive Parents in the United States

Denial of service to same-sex and interracial couples: Evidence from a national survey experiment

Differential fertility makes society more conservative on family values

Parent Practices and Home-School Partnerships: A Differential Effect for Children with Same-Sex Coupled Parents?

When disability and homoparenting meet: the adoption of children with disability by same sex couples

Lesbian, Gay, and Heterosexual Adoptive Parents' Experiences in Preschool Environments

A Content Analysis of Adoption Articles in Counseling Journals: A 30-Year Review

Support for family diversity: a three-country study

Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage, Polyamorous Marriage, and Conventional Marriage Ideals Among College Students in the Southeastern United States

Promoting the well-being of children whose parents are gay or lesbian

The Influence of Religious Affiliation on the Political Views of LGBT Americans

Comfort with LGB people and attitudes toward same-sex parenting in Continental American Hispanic Nations