Use of the Community of Inquiry Framework to Measure Student and Facilitator Perceptions of Online Flipped Classroom Compared with Online Lecture Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education
Julia J Chang,Adam Hain,Chrysoula Dosiou,Neil Gesundheit
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S413201
2023-09-07
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Abstract:Julia J Chang, 1 Adam Hain, 2 Chrysoula Dosiou, 1, &ast Neil Gesundheit 1, &ast 1 Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California; 2 Office of Medical Education, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Julia J Chang, Stanford School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr., Room S025, Stanford, CA, 94305, Tel +1 650-724-2474, Fax +1 (248) 720-4461, Email Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and a movement away from traditional lecture-based learning have increased the use of online flipped classroom (FC) and active learning models in medical education. The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework for online learning may be used to evaluate the effectiveness and strengths of the online FC model compared with other learning formats. Methods: An observational survey study was conducted to measure medical student and facilitator perceptions of an online FC endocrinology tutorial compared with online lecture experiences. For the tutorial, students were instructed to watch short, pre-recorded lecture videos on thyroid pathophysiology prior to class. During class, small groups of students were paired with a faculty facilitator in online Zoom rooms for case discussion. Students were surveyed using the CoI framework to assess elements of cognitive, social, and teaching presence between the two online learning modalities. Facilitators were also surveyed. Survey questions were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Fifty-three out of 92 students (58% response rate) and seven out of eight facilitators (88% response rate) completed surveys. In general, students felt that online FC learning improved cognitive, teaching, and social presence compared with online lecture. Areas of cognitive presence (mean score 3.9 ± 1.0 SD), such as stimulating curiosity and applying concepts, were highly rated. Certain elements of social presence (3.6 ± 0.9) and teaching presence (3.7 ± 0.9), such as expression of emotion and communication of expectations, garnered lower ratings. All surveyed facilitators felt that online FC was more effective and enjoyable to teach than online lectures but did not feel it was superior to in-person instruction. Conclusion: Medical students and facilitators viewed an online FC tutorial in endocrinology positively. Most, but not all, areas of the CoI framework were enhanced with the online FC tutorial compared with online lecture-based learning. Keywords: flipped classroom, online learning, community of inquiry, small group learning Active learning modalities, such as problem-based learning or team-based learning, usually involve high levels of student engagement, reflection, and discussion. In these modalities, learning is designed to be student-led and teacher-facilitated. 1 In contrast, traditional lecture-only formats lead to more passive student learning even when students are encouraged to participate and ask questions. 1,2 Over the last decade, undergraduate medical education has increasingly adopted the flipped classroom (FC) model to teach both pre-clinical and clinical curricula. 2–6 In the FC model, students complete online videos or reading material prior to class and engage in collaborative, active learning activities with other students during in-class time. 4,7–9 The role of the teacher during FC becomes to organize and guide students through activities, provide expert insight and feedback during discussion, and keep students on track. 4,7,8 While FC interventions in health professions education have shown increased student engagement, greater satisfaction in class, and improved exam scores, FC activities prior to the COVID-19 pandemic were conducted mostly face-to-face. 3,5,8 In 2020 with the rise of COVID-19 transmission, nearly all pre-clinical medical education curricula, including FC and other active learning sessions, shifted to the online setting out of public health necessity. Since the pandemic, some studies have also shown online FC to be a feasible learning model with similar benefits of higher student engagement and test performance compared with traditional online learning formats. 10–13 Still, lecture-based learning remains a common instructional method in undergraduate medical education. It requires fewer resources and less organization and is easier to implement online. 14,15 In addition, not all students prefer active learning modalities, and some students find them less efficient. 16,17 Social interaction may also feel less natural in online class settings, eve -Abstract Truncated-