Abstract:Background Computed tomography (CT) scan is a common imaging technique used to evaluate the severity of a head injury. The overuse of diagnostic interventions in the health system is a growing concern worldwide. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the rate of CT scan overuse in cases of mild head injury. Methods Eligibility criteria: We encompassed observational studies—either designed as cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional investigations—that reported on CT scan overuse rates for mild head injuries. Studies had to be published in peer-reviewed, English-language sources and provide full content access Information sources: Web of Sciences, Scopus, Medline via PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from inception until April 1, 2023. Studies were included if reporting the overuse of CT scans for mild head injuries using validated criteria. Risk of bias: We used the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies ‐ of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to evaluate the risk bias assessment of included studies. Two independent reviewers evaluated the eligibility of studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Synthesis of results: Overuse estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate any sources of heterogeneity. Point rate of overuse of CT scans for mild head injuries was the main outcome measured as percentage point estimates with corresponding 95% CIs. Results Included studies: Of the 913 potentially relevant studies identified, eight studies were selected for the final analysis. Synthesis of results: The pooled rate of CT scan overuse in patients with mild head injury was found to be 27% [95% CI: 16–43; I 2 = 99%]. The rate of CT scan overuse in mild head injury cases varied depending on the criteria used. The rate of CT scan overuse was 37% [95% CI: 32–42; I 2 = 0%] with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), 30% [95% CI: 16–49; I 2 = 99%] with the Canadian computed tomography head rule, and 10% [95% CI: 8–14; I 2 = 0%] with the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network criterion (PERCAN). Based on subgroup analyses, the rate of CT scan overuse in mild head injury cases was observed to be 30% with the Canadian computed tomography head rule criterion, 43% with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence criterion, and 18% with the New Orleans criterion. Conclusion Limitations of evidence: The restricted number of included studies may impact generalizability. High heterogeneity was observed, leading to subgroup analyses based on age, assessment criteria, and study region. Absent data on overuse causes hinders drawing conclusions on contributing factors. Furthermore, this study solely addressed overuse rates, not associated harm or benefits. Interpretation: The overuse of CT scans in mild head injury patients is concerning, as it can result in unnecessary radiation exposure and higher healthcare costs. Clinicians and policymakers should prioritize the implementation of guidelines to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure, healthcare costs, and potential harm to patients. Trial registration The study protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO under the identification code CRD42023416080 . https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023416080 .

Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Support Systems on the Appropriate Use of Imaging for Central Nervous System Injuries: A Systematic Review

A decision support system to increase the compliance of diagnostic imaging examinations with imaging guidelines: focused on cerebrovascular diseases

Does clinical decision support system promote expert consensus for appropriate imaging referrals? Chest-abdominal-pelvis CT as a case study

Clinical Decision Support System Used in Spinal Disorders: Scoping Review

Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of Research

The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical decision support systems-based interventions to improve medication outcomes: A systematic literature review on features and effects

Clinical decision support system recommendations: how often do radiologists and clinicians accept them?

Computerized clinical decision support systems for drug prescribing and management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review

A clinical decision support system to increase appropriateness of diagnostic imaging prescriptions

Accuracy and Effects of Clinical Decision Support Systems Integrated with BMJ Best Practice-Aided Diagnosis: Interrupted Time Series Study.

Clinical Impact of an AI Decision Support System for Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage in CT Scans

Impact of point-of-care clinical decision support on referrer behavior, imaging volume, patient radiation dose exposure, and sustainability

Overuse of computed tomography for mild head injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Advancing acceptance: assessing acceptance of the ESR iGuide clinical decision support system for improved computed tomography test justification

Effects of computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review of experimental and observational studies

Outcomes of clinical decision support systems in real-world perioperative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Clinical Decision Support Systems and Care Delivery

An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success

Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review

"Navigating the risks of pediatric head trauma: the role of imaging and radiation safety"