Abstract:The lean should be very minimal,9,10 from 5–7°, according to Alberto (see Figure 1). It is important that the lean is not greater or that it comes from bending at the waist. There are some who feel that the forward lean lets gravity assist you in running, but this has certainly been disputed. A better explanation seems to be that it causes a better posture, which allows one to activate the glutes more efficiently for power, rather than being so much quad dominated. Kinematics of the hip show that too much hip flexion may increase the risk of lower extremity injuries and affect running performance.11—Forward lean should be slightly increased from vertical. In this figure, the left line represents the vertical whereas the line represents the slight forward lean. Notice that the lean comes from the whole body rather than the trunk.Citation: International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training 25, 2; 10.1123/ijatt.2020-0011Arm swing should run from the hips to the nipples (see Figure 2). When watching sprinters running, I have seen that their hands come up straight to their eyes and extend back behind the hips. With distance running this would be a tremendous waste of energy. The arms help with balance, counterbalance for the opposite leg, vertical lift, assist with forward motion, and decrease rotation. Upon observation I find that many distance runners seldom use their arms or use their arms in a manner that actually causes inefficiency and, possibly, medical problems.—Hips to nips. The hands should move alternately from the levels of the nipples to the hips. Notice the lines drawn to indicate the "hips to nips" motion. It is also important to not "roll" the shoulders, causing more body rotation.Citation: International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training 25, 2; 10.1123/ijatt.2020-0011If the arms are going side to side, or across the body, this causes rotation of the body. This uses excess energy and is not helping in forward propulsion, which causes extra stress to the lower extremities. This extra stress is added to bones, muscle, tendons, and other areas that also have to handle shock absorption or propulsion. These extra stressors are probably precursors to lower extremity stress problems.The smooth motion of the shoulders, and the hands going hips to nips, keeps the rotational motions to a minimum. It also keeps excessive rise and fall of the center of gravity to a minimum.Stride length is one of the most documented motions in the research. Most of the research points to many problems associated with overstriding. The evidence supports that overstriding may increase injury risk or make running inefficient and slower. There is evidence to support that, as stride length is decreased, the probability of stress fracture is decreased 3–6%.12 Also, there is evidence to support that, as stride length is increased, more energy is absorbed.13Overstriding often translates to a more extended knee on landing, resulting in increased braking forces slowing the runner down. By landing more closely to the center of mass, the knee is more flexed and the braking forces are diminished. An appropriate stride length can affect the time on the ground, foot placement, and revolutions per minute (RPM)8,14 (see Figure 3).—Stride length. Foot strike should take place close to the center of mass—the further forward and away from the center of mass is indicative of overstriding. The lines indicate the relationship between foot strike and knee flexion angle as a result of striking close to the center of mass. Also, observe that the foot dorsiflexion angle should be more neutral, to be in an explosive position (see also Figure 5).Citation: International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training 25, 2; 10.1123/ijatt.2020-0011A rarely thought of and somewhat controversial point is foot placement and step width (i.e., how wide your feet should be from each other during ground contact). There is some evidence to support the idea that landing with a narrow step width (feet closer together) is more economical.15,16 However, it has also been proposed that greater foot and pelvic control are needed (especially within the frontal and transvers planes) with this style potentially contributing to iliotibial band and anterior tibialis pathologies as well as increased rotational forces on the tibia.17 While thes -Abstract Truncated-

Select Injury-Related Variables Are Affected by Stride Length and Foot Strike Style During Running

Lower extremity joint loads in habitual rearfoot and mid/forefoot strike runners with normal and shortened stride lengths

Effects of Foot Strike Techniques on Running Biomechanics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Motion in Naturally Forefoot and Rearfoot Strike Runners during Treadmill Running

Effects of running-induced fatigue on plantar pressure distribution in runners with different strike types

Three-Dimensional Biomechanical Analysis of Rearfoot and Forefoot Running

Foot strike and injury rates in endurance runners: a retrospective study.

What are the Benefits and Risks Associated with Changing Foot Strike Pattern During Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Injury, Running Economy, and Biomechanics

Running FASTER: Changing Running Technique to Reduce Stress Injuries

Do Strike Patterns or Shoe Conditions have a Predominant Influence on Foot Loading?

Leg Stiffness and Vertical Stiffness of Habitual Forefoot and Rearfoot Strikers During Running

Footwear and footstrike change loading patterns in running

An Acute Transition from Rearfoot to Forefoot Strike does not Induce Major Changes in Plantarflexor Muscles Activation for Habitual Rearfoot Strike Runners

Plantar load characteristics among runners with different strike patterns during preferred speed

Effects of Habitual Foot Strike Patterns on Patellofemoral Joint and Achilles Tendon Loading in Recreational Runner

Comparison of Plantar Loads among Runners with Different Strike Patterns

Risk Factors for Injuries in Runners: A Systematic Review of Foot Strike Technique and Its Classification at Impact

Foot Strike Pattern, Step Rate, and Trunk Posture Combined Gait Modifications to Reduce Impact Loading During Running.

Impact-Related Ground Reaction Forces Are More Strongly Associated With Some Running Injuries Than Others

Acute effect of foot strike patterns on in vivo tibiotalar and subtalar joint kinematics during barefoot running

A Re-examination of the Measurement of Foot Strike Mechanics During Running: The Immediate Effect of Footwear Midsole Thickness